> I disagree. GWM is basically a social media mirror,
GWM is not a mirror - it's an archive. On your own social media, you can delete photos and only show what you want. Those photos stay up permanently here, unless the model asks for a takedown every time. Models do in fact choose to delete older photos if they are changing their image. E.g. Caitlin Rice, who got butt implants and deleted her pre-implant photos.
> and unless the account is private (or in her case straight up gone) I see no problem unless we are defaming someone or making money off of their image.
There are a lot of private instagram accounts whose photos we keep here, because the models do not or cannot be bothered to submit a takedown. Also, many people cannot make up their minds about keeping their IG private - they almost always make it public occasionally. GWM again acts as an archive - it neither automatically deletes or locks away photos just because someone deletes it on their social media, or has a breakup and makes their IG private for a week while removing photos of their ex.
> This site is objectively not worse than some of her stuff she’s done on video in the past that have easily accessible screenshots that don’t point here. Some of the comments, on the other hand.....
GWM is tame, honestly. I think Aleesha's strategy is asinine, and goes against the reality of the internet, but I do still believe it's about (attempting) to shape her image via control.
Your semantic argument aside, Aleesha Young actually promotes stuff through her insta though. It's asinine to think that forcing everyone to go straight to the source wouldn't increase her views. We all have to go to her page now, as opposed to a few people copying it, or a small percentage who would view both. It's not like she would gain anything from GWM exposure, everyone already knows who she is.
But, to be fair she does have a daughter who's getting older. Maybe she doesn't want her reading certain comments about her? idk. I guess that would depend on what type of comments she allows on her insta. If that's the case, that's still reasonable and not asinine. I'm not going to knock her for being removed.
Patricia Gosselin (@pat.gosselin.ifbbpro) is one I just remembered. In the last year or so she's had amazing ripped glutes that she seems to like showing off.
It's permissible to post social media accounts, but simply gathering all of the names in this thread into one post is verboten? Sometimes the administration on this site is impossible.
It's permissible to post social media accounts, but simply gathering all of the names in this thread into one post is verboten? Sometimes the administration on this site is impossible.
all they asked for was their images to be removed. we can still talk about them lol
all they asked for was their images to be removed. we can still talk about them lol
I don’t know why they want their images to be removed though. Like I understand wanting to remove paysite content, but most of the other pictures can be found either on social media or just a google image search
all they asked for was their images to be removed. we can still talk about them lol
I posted a list of all the names in this thread. It was deleted.
Just the names. The ones that everyone else already mentioned. In alphabetical order.
I posted a list of all the names in this thread. It was deleted.
Just the names. The ones that everyone else already mentioned. In alphabetical order.
Chainer once mentioned not wanting the blacklist to be public. Simply talking about blacklisted models already treads a grey area. Hell, some models even asked for their names not to appear here at all (Danielle Yaros), and Chainer even adjusted the search page to accommodate the request, so this thread already goes against their wishes.
Too bad really. This thread is interesting, and I bet it will be locked soon once it gets too big and makes it too easy to deduce the blacklist.
I get that models want their privacy, and the DMCA gives them rights over their pictures. There are no laws however that obligate GWM to obscure their names. In my opinion the blacklist should just be public - once their pictures are taken down, all legal obligations are already fulfilled. This silly "in between" state of allowing individuals to be discussed but not the collective should stop.
Another edit: Frankly, the biggest issue with internet privacy is ironically opacity or a lack of information. Take Michelle Gavin for instance. Most people are unaware she had problems with stalkers, and that her nudes are leaks that she doesn't want public. People to this day post those pictures unaware of her plight. If people knew her wishes, it'd be easier to respect them. A public blacklist would arguably help protect privacy more than hurt it.
Michelle Gavin did the same but her case is different. Not sure for Micaela's case but guess things like that happens sometimes
That's pretty much the type of thing the Fantasy section is for, after all.
There was some warping.bending around the waist and arms that was very suspicious, and that’s typically where a woman might make some editing changes to her photos
Krishna Santos