Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
It's an AI-generated image, so no. The mod who deleted it probably selected the wrong reason.
No, she is real. Hitsuji Negoto, she is a cosplayer, and this is a photo from one of her photo shoots. The post-processing is visible, but it is not photoshop. And she is wearing a wig here to look like an anime girl, if that confused you
Thanks for providing reference data PP1000.
After careful examination, I can confirm those leg muscles are heavily edited.
Her picture on November 2nd shows no muscular development in the hamstrings or calves.
The "Brazilian Miku" photo also highlights a glaring absence of musculature.
Finally, this video.
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.
Thanks for providing reference data PP1000.
After careful examination, I can confirm those leg muscles are heavily edited.
Her picture on November 2nd shows no muscular development in the hamstrings or calves.
The "Brazilian Miku" photo also highlights a glaring absence of musculature.
Finally, this video.
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.
It's sad that people still don't realize the power of perspective, light and shadow, and in this case, the banal tension of muscles and their volume at a particular moment in time. This girl doesn't set a goal to have noticeable muscles all year round. She or the photographer just decided to emphasize her leg muscles, for which she stood on her toes, obviously a favorable perspective was chosen and light and shadow was applied to enhance the effect. If we had to delete every photo here where these manipulations are carried out, we would lose a good third of the photos. Whether this is good or bad, decide for yourself, but emphasizing volumes, unlike morphs, is legal one way or another
Thanks for providing reference data PP1000.
After careful examination, I can confirm those leg muscles are heavily edited.
Her picture on November 2nd shows no muscular development in the hamstrings or calves.
The "Brazilian Miku" photo also highlights a glaring absence of musculature.
Finally, this video.
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.
If only she decided to work out she’d look way better.
It's sad that people still don't realize the power of perspective, light and shadow, and in this case, the banal tension of muscles and their volume at a particular moment in time. This girl doesn't set a goal to have noticeable muscles all year round. She or the photographer just decided to emphasize her leg muscles, for which she stood on her toes, obviously a favorable perspective was chosen and light and shadow was applied to enhance the effect. If we had to delete every photo here where these manipulations are carried out, we would lose a good third of the photos. Whether this is good or bad, decide for yourself, but emphasizing volumes, unlike morphs, is legal one way or another
Qimmah is a perfect example of This but this model (4iP_3iP) is not, the weight difference is way too noticeable here she looks totally different irl very skinny zero muscle even when flexed.. she doesn’t belong.
Ripped? are you kidding? The only reason any of her muscles are at all remotely visible is because she is skinny.
I agree.
If I had seen that on the site I wouldn't hesitate to report it. Not that I'm trying to pop anybodies balloon but there is no muscle on this model. There's been a real influx of posts the past couple of months that fit into the so skinny there's nothing but muscle left category but that doesn't qualify as toned or athletic.
I do not know if this is the right place to argue about this but I got my upload reported as well:
There is no ai or any editing involved here but most importantly she clearly has a well delfined, dare I say " ripped " six-pack so I don’t understand. How little is too little muscle ?
Yeah I'm reporting this every time, this is someone with below average muscularity.
We should remind people that the site is "Girls with Muscle" and not "Fit Looking Women". The bar for acceptance in each category is not the same.
Also, the acceptance is about "visible muscle", since some models may appear muscular in one photo, but not in another. We are judging on the contents of the photo and not the generalisation of the model.
Guys, is it possible to somehow appeal the removal of the image? One of the admins, using the excuse “Not enough visible musclularity,” deleted my upload, and it gained almost 40 points in less than 24 hours. It’s more like a mockery, you can see for yourself that she has powerful quadriceps and calves, and no one here deletes pics with only calves