Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
What do we have for "natural chests", no implants?
There's one for no breast, but that both sounds a little insulting, and I'm not sure even really applies that well to a pic like this that's currently tagged (same issue with "flat chest"). It might be better to just make one for "natural chest" and merge that in, unless anyone has another suggestion. The only potential issue would be women with natural large breasts, but in the context of this site I think the implication of "natural chest" is a pretty lean chest due to low bodyfat percentage in the vast majority of pics, especially when someone is going out of their way to tag it.
There's one for no breast, but that both sounds a little insulting, and I'm not sure even really applies that well to a pic like this that's currently tagged (same issue with "flat chest"). It might be better to just make one for "natural chest" and merge that in, unless anyone has another suggestion. The only potential issue would be women with natural large breasts, but in the context of this site I think the implication of "natural chest" is a pretty lean chest due to low bodyfat percentage in the vast majority of pics, especially when someone is going out of their way to tag it.
Could "pure pecs" or "real pecs" work? Simple, complimentary?
As a fan of the "no breast" tag, I would like to request that it not be turned into "natural chest", since I do think that would often get used for naturally busty women. If you think it sounds insulting, then I think I'd prefer "flat chest", although I think I personally still prefer the current one (just because bulging pecs are very much not flat). tre_sayer also has a good idea.
On a separate note, I just found the most useless tag of all time: someone tagged this picture https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2353380/ with "body".
I think a tag for "longer videos" or "long vids" (language tbd) would be great. To be able to sort for things longer than 1 minute or so. There are just so many 5-15 second videos that I could skip, beautiful as they may be.
Someone already made a tag for "long video".
Not entirely sure what would generally qualify, over a minute is good I guess? That's seems to be mostly how it's being used so far.
Personally, I would like a tag for women over 50 years.
"Mature" is already being used mostly for that. There are some 47-49 year olds, but it isn't really worth a separate tag that would be mostly redundant and likely end up merged into "mature". You could probably get more distinctive results with something like an "over 60" tag, though.
Which, again, anyone can just make by starting to tag appropriate pics with it, that's the whole point of the custom tagging system.
"sweat workout"
Something like that is probably best served by just adding the individual tags working out and sweat. You can then search for images that are tagged with both.
Well apparently some people still have no idea of visible human anatomy as this was labelled "glutes" and it isn't the only one.
She definitely has glutes, wish they were bigger and as defined as her guns 💪
Hey, mods. Can I ask for some clarity on use of the "huge biceps" tag? This is one of my favorites, but currently there's a lot of variation in how it's used. There are some really huge biceps, like these:
And then there are some big, nice, toned... but much smaller ones, like these:
I would like some guidance on whether this tag should apply to all of these biceps that I posted, or just the bigger ones.
My personal view: I think it should only be the bigger ones. Of course the latter ones are still "huge" for women in general, but they're not really huge relative to the women on this site. I love the huge biceps tag because it lets me find just the biggest of the big women. It would lose its usefulness, in my opinion, if women of that smaller size were brought in. It would feel pointless. And I suspect that people who've tagged some of these smaller women are just using the tag out of excitement - sort of "Wow, this girl is really hot and I love her biceps, let me put on some tags about how great they are!". They may be great and toned and symmetrical, but I don't think they fit this tag.
Sorry for the rant lol, up to you mods.
Yeah, that's just people misapplying the tag, not too uncommon. Some of them might not even be intentional, due to misclicks on the autocomplete list while adding tags. If you see a tag like that on pics where it pretty clearly doesn't belong, like these two (nice pics, but not "huge biceps" by the standards of this site), feel free to remove them:
The mods get automated alerts about possible tag vandalism, but it's pretty easy to tell when someone is doing legitimate cleanup. Overuse of a tag like that would just make it redundant to the regular "biceps" tag.
I've cleaned up the use of the tag on most of the pics where it was most obviously misapplied, including the above ones.
My personal favorite new tags so far:
oiled will probably become one, but it's pretty sparse right now.
hard calves is one I created and tagged a few pics for to get started (planning to do some more), but I'm wondering if it should be called something else. The idea was to capture the diamond-hard "you could cut glass with those!" calves, but I'm worried it might get applied too generically. "Sharp calves" instead, maybe?
A couple ideal examples of what I'm talking about:
Angular calves? Polyhedral calves? I dig the category!
Just a note on this, I'm planning to merge the vellus hair tag into body hair, since the way they're being used currently is functionally identical for the most part. There were a handful of pics that only seemed to be tagged with "body hair" for the sake of armpit hair, but those have been switched over to the "hairy armpit" tag ("body hair" was left if it also applied).
And yes, those tags are all definitely staying as login-only, ya weirdos :D