There was a comment on a picture earlier today praising a woman's "hot" acne. Was it the acne that was hot though? Assuming they were not trolling, it's that it belonged to a woman. Some of the more outlandish comments easily obscure more fundamental factors; factors overlooked in the same way that fish don't know they're wet. Would the acne be "hot" if it belonged to a dude? Traits are not easily disaggregated. When a woman says the feature she most appreciates about her boyfriend is his integrity (or whatever), a lot of men roll their eyes. Yeah, it's not that he's tall, rich, handsome, AND famous??
> My two cents, canāt wait to see all the chest hair lovers come running to blow this up.
I'm on the same page, except that I'm not a big fan of breast impants simply because they aren't real and don't feel real in my experience. When I see them all i can think about is how fake they feel on a woman with little to no natural breast tissue surrounding them. That and the fact than most of them on FBB look fake as shit so I can't even pretend they're real lol.
I agree on the rest though. Rough skin, masculine voices, body hair -- all a HUGE turn off for me. I like WOMEN. No knock on anyone who is bisexual or gay or not sure. But I am sure and aside from muscles, I don't like ANYTHING masculine on a woman. Giant cl*ts are nauseating to me.
So, yeah. I get it. When I see guys here celebrating extreme steroid abuse or calling women "studs" or anything along those lines, I cringe for sure and I kinda wish "those guys" had their own section of the site so I didn't have to see their comments or look at the shit they like.
That said, I try to be more accepting and tolerant of differences and I realize our fetish in general isn't super popular so we kind of have to stick together and welcome anyone in the same boat I guess.
But yeah, I like FEMININE women with muscles. My ideal girls on this site are the more pretty and natural looking ones who are under 30 or so and have no tattoos and nice smooth, soft skin (not over-tanned and dried out like a piece of beef jerky)
For me, the ultimate girls on this site are girls like: Dylan Crenshaw, Julia Vins,Lea Schreiner, Yeon Woo-Jhi, Lena Ramsteiner etc.
This, to me, is about as close as you can get to perfection:
Honestly I'm with you there. Some of the more extreme cases to me aren't so much attraction as they are fascination, just how far one is willing to go for what they're passionate about
Like yeah, I browse pics of Tiffani Wittman every so often. But if someone put a gun to my head and told me to pick a buff woman irl it'd very much be along the lines of what you're describing. Except sometimes people can't distinguish between fantasy and reality, or rather conflate the two.
Thereās never going to be a one size fits all description, but I donāt think itās that much of a secret that for a lot of us, itās attractive to see a woman be masculine and take on a more masculine role. Being muscular fits right in with that. It can be for aesthetic reasons, role reversal reasons, whatever. The silly part is devoting any time to questioning if itās gay or not, because genuinely, why does it matter? Iām not even saying this in a way to dismiss/deflect the question, or to preach some kind of acceptance of others or your own sexuality, Iām asking for a practical reason. If itās scientifically proven that itās not gay, what does it change? If youāre worried about it being more ānormalā if itās not, youāre still fantasizing over something that the vast majority of the population is going to view as abnormal and weird. There are definitely big downsides to this fetish in terms of practical applications for it if itās something that drives a lot of your desires/interests, but worrying about how you fit in a box sexually because of it is just silly and futile.
Great point.