Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
You can spend a few George Washingtons and check Melissa out on Her Biceps.
As for Nicole Siff, checking her IG sites finds that she may be starting her own fitness business(es).
@shav...thanks for the info on Melissa. I watched her trailer on herbiceps.com. She was not to the peak level she was at, when her videos were last posted here but still very hot.
You can spend a few George Washingtons and check Melissa out on Her Biceps.
As for Nicole Siff, checking her IG sites finds that she may be starting her own fitness business(es).
im not surprised, capitalize on being hot by posting all that kind of stuff, and then shut it all down once you reach critical mass, its the business model lmao
You can find more, and better, Brodsky on Premium Physiques. I was looking in the wrong place and found she is not on the parent HD Physiques site.
sadly thats the only content of her there. i doubt they will shoot again.
Damn! I didn’t see that coming. I wonder why?
It was one of those semi-automated ones some agency sends on her behalf.
I'm guessing the way it works is: The model signs up for the service, either on their own or through whatever agency they have managing their onlyfans. Then the service searches the internet for the model's pictures, and when they find them on here they send a formal DMCA takedown request, saying they are acting on behalf of the model, and cite the model's onlyfans. From a legal point of view this is probably true in the sense that the model probably did sign something or other to authorize it, but she is unlikely to be aware of the specific takedown request sent to here in particular.
It was one of those semi-automated ones some agency sends on her behalf.
I'm guessing the way it works is: The model signs up for the service, either on their own or through whatever agency they have managing their onlyfans. Then the service searches the internet for the model's pictures, and when they find them on here they send a formal DMCA takedown request, saying they are acting on behalf of the model, and cite the model's onlyfans. From a legal point of view this is probably true in the sense that the model probably did sign something or other to authorize it, but she is unlikely to be aware of the specific takedown request sent to here in particular.
But the copyright for a photo lies with the photographer, not the model, unless it is on behalf of an agency due to any previous contractual arrangement. So they will have no right to demand removal of ALL images of their client, their client (the model) has no right to demand that legally. You may well decide to remove models to avoid conflict or ambiguity but Onlyfans have no jurisdiction over images produced by other sources. Any takedown should specify which images are relevant and why. Also, just because a model posts something on their Instagram etc, doesn't mean they have the right to do so, though most photographers allow it in small samples for promotion, and want to keep good relations with models.
I'd be curious to know how many times Saradas has been "served" with formal DMCA takedown requests and how many times Saradas has actually complied.
To PP1000's point, it would seem that services issuing DMCA takedown requests could be asked to identify which pictures, using the reason that some pictures may copyrighted by someone other than the model. And may be here with approval of the copyright holder. The response could be interesting.
I'd be curious to know how many times Saradas has been "served" with formal DMCA takedown requests and how many times Saradas has actually complied.
To PP1000's point, it would seem that services issuing DMCA takedown requests could be asked to identify which pictures, using the reason that some pictures may copyrighted by someone other than the model. And may be here with approval of the copyright holder. The response could be interesting.
I think any of that stuff is in the VIP section which isn’t public. Last I was in there a lot was dl links which eventually expire
I'd be curious to know how many times Saradas has been "served" with formal DMCA takedown requests and how many times Saradas has actually complied.
To PP1000's point, it would seem that services issuing DMCA takedown requests could be asked to identify which pictures, using the reason that some pictures may copyrighted by someone other than the model. And may be here with approval of the copyright holder. The response could be interesting.
I’ve seen discussions about that website on here before regarding this topic and the consensus was that they keep their server in a country where local officials (law enforcement, courts, etc) will ignore a letter from an American lawyer demanding that they shut down some server hosting pictures on the internet (or happily take a bribe to ignore the request).
I’ve seen discussions about that website on here before regarding this topic and the consensus was that they keep their server in a country where local officials (law enforcement, courts, etc) will ignore a letter from an American lawyer demanding that they shut down some server hosting pictures on the internet (or happily take a bribe to ignore the request).
But Saradas don't directly host any images as far as I know, they use third party image hosts like imagebam that can be linked to from anywhere eg on other forums as well, so surely it's those third party hosts that the DMCA takedowns would need to be directed to.
I'm pretty sure GWM voluntarily takes the moral high road in these cases. If someone asks, they'll take the pics down regardless of the law. IMO, it's the honorable thing to do and I'd appreciate it if it were me making the request.
That said: Mason Everett comes to mind
But the copyright for a photo lies with the photographer, not the model, unless it is on behalf of an agency due to any previous contractual arrangement. So they will have no right to demand removal of ALL images of their client, their client (the model) has no right to demand that legally. You may well decide to remove models to avoid conflict or ambiguity but Onlyfans have no jurisdiction over images produced by other sources. Any takedown should specify which images are relevant and why. Also, just because a model posts something on their Instagram etc, doesn't mean they have the right to do so, though most photographers allow it in small samples for promotion, and want to keep good relations with models.
You are right but that would leave it to me to sort out which is which, which I am not able to do.
Melissa Brodsky. Right before she blacklisted, her biceps posing and workouts were incredible.