Moderating pix with no muscle

Just finished a round of member moderating of proposed pictures. Do it about once a week. There recently seems to be a run of proposed pictures of women that may be fit, but showing no muscle (I tend to look at the shoulders first). Bellies may be flat, but if no ab muscle showing, I turn it down. Most of all, saw a bunch with absolutely no muscle, but big fake chests. Since I don't upload, won't complain too much. But this is a site for women with muscle, not skinny models.

Good to know a mod feels the same way concerning some of those pics. Seems like there's still a few that slip through and leave me wondering how they ever made it onto the site... o.0

I noticed it as well. I was wondering if people just upload some pics sometimes just to see if it would get through

I am in 100% agreement with this. Somehow I will have a photo denied to the website, but then I'll see a photo of a girl in a similar pose with SIGNIFICANTLY less muscle than I do... but she has ass implants and big fake boobs. Then I get confused thinking "this is Girls With MUSCLE, right???"

If you're posting your own pictures, take a look at http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/verification . If you verify, you'll be able to skip the queue when uploading.

If you're referring to bikini models..I see how that is accurate. Otherwise you don't have SIGNIFICANTLY more than any other girls on here.Just keep posting your stuff and being proud. Getting in a pissy frame of mind with other women here and getting jealous of the approval they get won't change how mods or ratings decide which of the pics you submit go up.You get great ratings and comments, so I'm not sure why you are even complaining.

If you want all your pics up instantly and not denied, get verified as Chainer suggested.

I agree with buffgirl and cheaf.

If we add up all the bikini girls, Brazilian big ass, and all other random skinny girls we reach a huge number.
It is very likely to be more girls without muscles that with muscles in GWM.
And that is not right! >:(

I notice that the home page now has a place to click if one wants to help approve new pictures for the site. Tonight, I just voted NO on at least 50 pictures of the same fashion model, including a couple of her actually walking a runway. Her "highlights" included toothpick arms; no delts, skinny legs, no abs, minimal back muscle. In disclosure, I did say YES on a couple pictures that showed the barely-there back muscle.

Regarding kakuzade's comment, I've also voted NO on a bunch of big rear ends, and no muscle, models in recent days.

In the past few weeks, at least one fairly frequent poster has been on a "run" of trying to post this type of fashion model. I vote NO when I'm on the site and actually spending time screening. But I'm not on the site the multiple times per day to screen out these non-muscular models. The official moderators have to step up. Now that the offer is on the home page, I'm guessing that a greater number of these non-muscular women will start appearing on the site. If so, Girls With Muscle was a nice idea while it lasted.

I do the same!


But I fear that while we vote no to those skinny girls eventually they are going to approve the moderation.

I think the administrators have not communicated clearly what is the profile of girl from GWM.
I think I'll put a topic about it.

Something is really wrong when this http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/553241/ gets posted >:( 

No muscle but dayum I'm sure you wouldn't kick her out of bed....

If you give me to choose between her and Dana Linn Bailey I stay with Dana. The logic is that are a member of GWM what you like in a girl are your muscles right? If you like you normal women are other places that you can go.

I too would stay with Dana for sure but if this girl was available and there was no muscle babe around I'd surely give her .....

The fact that a girl is sexy does not make sense in GWM. Should have muscles. Therefore it should vote NO to the girls who do not.

What's worse is when I am moderating there are lots more of these regular models with no muscles, abs barely showing. Even if you click no, they somehow eventually make it unto the website. What's even more these pics are getting rated 10's. Wonder how many pics the moderators remove per day. Or are they more concerned with getting large numbers of pics instead of quality pics.

I do not think administrators delete a picture that is already uploaded by quality issues. I think they do only in cases of watermarks copyrighted or nudity ...

Moreover, as are the rules of moderation currently they have to eliminate all the FBB and to allow the Brazilian big ass and all other skinny.

(woo thread necromancy)

I have found that the biggest issue and the most annoying problem for me is always when I click "No", and then I browse the images...and there she is. My No vote for skinny girl with huge ass implants (not just huge-ass implants :p) meant nothing because someone doesn't want 'girls with muscle', but 'girls with huge asses'