Log in | Register
« first < prev Page 424 of 433 next > last »
wertol
Jul 25, 2009 - context
kups1234
Jul 24, 2009 - context
Great job and as usual responding to what the visitors of the site suggest! Nice job!
Chainer
Jul 23, 2009 - context
I've just implemented this, let me know what you think.
Chainer
Jul 22, 2009 - context
That's very strange. I've not had anything like it (at least not on this site).

Can you give more details - which pics? What browser / operating system are you using? Exactly what buttons are you clicking to try to download them?
anon-e-mouse
Jul 21, 2009 - context
What pics are you looking to download? I just checked Jodi Miller's pics (.jpg posted by Kristi) and found that most of them come back as "no preview available" however a couple of them came back as skewed color pics. (Shows a pic of her but with lines running through it, etc.) Nothing with red x's, though. I don't know if that's just because I'm running an older system (Windows ME) or not, but I do remember being able to access them when they were first posted. I'm not computer savvy enough to figure it out... :(
vindicator58
Jul 21, 2009 - context
All of a sudden all I get for pics are red x's and have for days!  Can anyone tell me what to do?
atombender
Jul 19, 2009 - context
atombender
Jul 18, 2009 - context
If there's any doubt about a girl being too young and sexually suggestive, I'd get rid of it. There's often a thin line between glamour and sexual innuendo. And there are many sickos on the net who want to apply Rule 34 to everything. However, if a pic is strictly sporty in nature like the young weightlifter (well you don't do sports or workout in jeans and sweaters) or a girl with nice abs which happens to be an occasional shot or a myspace album, I for myself don't see any problem.
Chainer
Jul 18, 2009 - context
I've already made lengthier posts about this, so I'll just address some of the points you made:

Last I knew it was completely illegal to post pictures of children on sites that contain or give resource to nudity.
False on the illegal part. I might agree with you and think it odd if pictures of children were to be on the same page as the links to nudity (which has happened once, and I deleted the nudity link). However, on this site (which I'm defining to be girlswithmuscle.com and forum.girlswithmuscle.com), any pictures of minors are on different pages, and in a different context, than links to nudity. Also note that nudity isn't allowed on the main site.

I read that it was against the rules to post pictures of women that look just too young. ... It's creepy something should be done about people breaking the rules.
It's against my rules to post images of children on the main site. In the past week or so I rejected about 20-30 uploaded images of girls who looked like they were less than 11-12 from appearing on the main site. Also, a 15-year-old is not a child.

These young women are being RATED on a scale of 1 to 10... I'm a guy I rate something high I not only find them pretty but sexually attractive...

Ratings can be based on any number of things other than sexual attractiveness, including muscle definition, size, etc. I suppose all of us rate images based on slightly varying criteria; this site is about girls with muscle, nothing more or less.

I'm willing to bet that quite a few people still in high school browsing this site appreciate images like this.

I apologize for any curtness, but it does bother me a bit when self-appointed morality police come and throw around words like "disgusting" and "illegal" in an attempt to control what people should and should not be looking at.
pauld
Jul 18, 2009 - context
I don't look at all muscular women with a sexual intent, perhaps that is a failing of yours - but not everyone.  I also agree that little girls (or boys) should not be on sites like this.
ursus
Jul 17, 2009 - context
If all the privates are covered up I really don't see what the problem is.   It's not illegal to look at an otherwise clothed 16 year old girl flexing her bicep. 
anon-e-mouse
Jul 16, 2009 - context
You need to go check out this topic which has been cussed and discussed before. Look under MultiMedia>Pictures, pg. 2, last item: MOVED: Thoughts On Content?
runnun
Jul 16, 2009 - context
Come on seriously, some of these girls look maybe 12-13... even 15
This girl is like 15 or 16 call me crazy but most of the men here are obviously turned on by fit WOMEN... posting picture little girls just becomes creepy.  I honestly think it isn't even right that it be posted
Especially when comments float around that lean towards a sexual nature...  Is there not an age limit of pics for the women... It's a sick world everyone knows it is but thats just disgusting... My point and case is this forum does have links to nudity so then the site does... I like fit WOMEN I think its apparent, but little girls?  That's wrong and disgusting.  You can't trust people, definately not on the internet.  I read that it was against the rules to post pictures of women that look just too young.  So why isn't it being reinforced?  Sure gymnasts can look alot younger then they really are.  But honestly.  It's creepy something should be done about people breaking the rules.  These young women are being RATED on a scale of 1 to 10... I'm a guy I rate something high I not only find them pretty but sexually attractive... Try to say men arent this way so I can call you a liar.  I doubt a male is going to rate a woman on her respective ability to have muscle... I think my point is made there is no reason to drag on...  A few pictures of girls that I will gurantee are under age. Last I knew it was completely illegal to post pictures of children on sites that contain or give resource to nudity.

http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=4300   14 years old.
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=13230 can't be older then 16
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=10933 looks to be maybe 14-15
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=8852 12-15 max
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=7838 Highschoolers
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=6401 Highschoolers AGAIN
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=2770 Early to mid teens

Chainer
Jul 16, 2009 - context
This is a good idea, I'll look into it.
Chainer
Jul 15, 2009 - context
That's right, and fixed.
atombender
Jul 15, 2009 - context
mranonymous
Jul 15, 2009 - context
Hi Chainer!
I really like your site :)
I just like to give you an advice..
Why don't you change the votes layout, changing them from a select list, to a...dunno how to call...mmm...... anyway, all the votes like this:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
So you just have to click..it's much faster, and i think more people would vote :)

Clearly..this is just an advice!
Keep up the good work, Chainer.

Bye bye
Chainer
Jul 15, 2009 - context
Fixed, as always thanks for the reports.
wertol
Jul 14, 2009 - context
Chainer
Jul 13, 2009 - context
I'm looking for a moderator mostly to help me look through image uploads on the main site, but for other tasks as well perhaps.
The only requirement is that you have about 20 minutes a day to browse GWM and look through image submissions and some image comments. Experience with web development (PHP, MySQL, javascript, HTML, CSS) would be nice, but is not required.

If you're interested, please send me a personal message on these forums (or an email to girlswithmuscle@gmail.com) answering the following questions:

1. What is your username on the main site?

2. How many days a week do you visit GWM?

3. For how long do you browse GWM each day that you visit?

4. Describe your experience with web development (PHP, MySQL, javascript, HTML, CSS):

5. As you're looking through submissions, the following 31 images have been uploaded. You get to choose which ones go on the main site and which ones are denied. Which ones would you deny AND WHY?

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.


Thanks.
wertol
Jul 12, 2009 - context
atombender
Jul 09, 2009 - context
Chainer
Jul 06, 2009 - context
fixed, thanks
wertol
Jul 04, 2009 - context
pauld
Jul 03, 2009 - context
Seems like the "top 10" list has qite a bit of fluctuation, perhaps not allowing pics with less than 10 votes or so to go up on at least the 1st page will help a little.
« first < prev Page 424 of 433 next > last »