We only want to have one main tag to designate onstage stuff, currently it's "competition", but I'm wondering if I should change that to "contest" instead, to go along with "contest tan". If so, I guess "competition suit" should also be changed to "contest suit" to keep everything consistent?
Does anyone have any thoughts?
What is the definition of "pectoral split" tag?
I'm honestly not too sure, I'm tempted to just merge it into "pecs" as being too vague for people to figure out what it's intended for.
Beyond basic file hash, there isnât. I suppose a check based of video length and model name could be used, but it may be a source of too many false positives and it wouldnât deal with videos which are partial videos of another.
Could probably do exact length down to the millisecond, but anything falling on exact second marks would have to be ignored as too common (possibly also 10's of milliseconds?)
Beyond basic file hash, there isnât. I suppose a check based of video length and model name could be used, but it may be a source of too many false positives and it wouldnât deal with videos which are partial videos of another.
Exact matching based on the contents of the file (aka, its hash). This means the file you are uploading is a literal, byte-for-byte duplicate of something already on the site. These are rejected outright at upload time.
The similarity-based method tamarok mentions above. This is able to detect images which are the same, even if one is a resize of the other. It's even tuned right now so that it basically never has a false positive. The problem is that this can't auto-reject images because we don't know which one is higher quality. In order to decide, we still need a mod to look at it. As a result, this just auto-generates an image report for mods to look at rather than outright rejecting the upload.
It's possible that many of those Leyvina uploads were in fact caught by the second one of these, but a mod hadn't yet had a chance to look at the image reports.
If only she decided to work out sheâd look way better.
Qimmah is a perfect example of This but this model (4iP_3iP) is not, the weight difference is way too noticeable here she looks totally different irl very skinny zero muscle even when flexed.. she doesnât belong.
Can you please tell me How does the similar image detection work ? By meta data ?
If yes it will be difficult to disincentivize.
Itâs by a library the creates a signature based on the image content. The challenge is that it is CPU intensive. Anything with a high CPU hit will impact site performance and hence degrade the experience to people visiting the site.
AI based solutions would likely impact the CPU even more.
Finding the right solution involves balancing many considerations and factors.
I've been trying to think of a way to disincentivize this but haven't come up with anything simple and likely to work. If anyone has ideas I'm all ears.
I've previous also asked what criteria is used to detect dups.
This is an area where AI might possibly be useful to scan images to flag up possible dups
but I don't know how practical or useful it would be for you here even if it were possible to implement.
Otherwise uploads say, to the most popular models (if named as they are uploaded) get held before manual mod approval?
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.
If only she decided to work out sheâd look way better.
It's sad that people still don't realize the power of perspective, light and shadow, and in this case, the banal tension of muscles and their volume at a particular moment in time. This girl doesn't set a goal to have noticeable muscles all year round. She or the photographer just decided to emphasize her leg muscles, for which she stood on her toes, obviously a favorable perspective was chosen and light and shadow was applied to enhance the effect. If we had to delete every photo here where these manipulations are carried out, we would lose a good third of the photos. Whether this is good or bad, decide for yourself, but emphasizing volumes, unlike morphs, is legal one way or another
Qimmah is a perfect example of This but this model (4iP_3iP) is not, the weight difference is way too noticeable here she looks totally different irl very skinny zero muscle even when flexed.. she doesnât belong.
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.
It's sad that people still don't realize the power of perspective, light and shadow, and in this case, the banal tension of muscles and their volume at a particular moment in time. This girl doesn't set a goal to have noticeable muscles all year round. She or the photographer just decided to emphasize her leg muscles, for which she stood on her toes, obviously a favorable perspective was chosen and light and shadow was applied to enhance the effect. If we had to delete every photo here where these manipulations are carried out, we would lose a good third of the photos. Whether this is good or bad, decide for yourself, but emphasizing volumes, unlike morphs, is legal one way or another
But 'muscle_club_vip' doesn't sound like something that defines any official source from the model? Good chance the account uploader isn't paying attention to morphs?
Is there a bit more explanation to this than âfakeâ
Well yeah, looking at the full pic it appears to be unquestionably morphed and/or AI-"enhanced". Provide a link to where you got it from if you want to claim otherwise.
Log in |
Register
We only want to have one main tag to designate onstage stuff, currently it's "competition", but I'm wondering if I should change that to "contest" instead, to go along with "contest tan". If so, I guess "competition suit" should also be changed to "contest suit" to keep everything consistent?
Does anyone have any thoughts?
I'm honestly not too sure, I'm tempted to just merge it into "pecs" as being too vague for people to figure out what it's intended for.
đ
Could probably do exact length down to the millisecond, but anything falling on exact second marks would have to be ignored as too common (possibly also 10's of milliseconds?)
Beyond basic file hash, there isnât. I suppose a check based of video length and model name could be used, but it may be a source of too many false positives and it wouldnât deal with videos which are partial videos of another.
Is there any auto detection of video dups?
There are two ways we detect duplicates:
It's possible that many of those Leyvina uploads were in fact caught by the second one of these, but a mod hadn't yet had a chance to look at the image reports.
Kristina Zafirova has now surpassed Melinda Lindmark to become the 2nd most subscribed girl in this site... Great..
I agree with you.
Itâs by a library the creates a signature based on the image content. The challenge is that it is CPU intensive. Anything with a high CPU hit will impact site performance and hence degrade the experience to people visiting the site.
AI based solutions would likely impact the CPU even more.
Finding the right solution involves balancing many considerations and factors.
I've previous also asked what criteria is used to detect dups.
This is an area where AI might possibly be useful to scan images to flag up possible dups but I don't know how practical or useful it would be for you here even if it were possible to implement. Otherwise uploads say, to the most popular models (if named as they are uploaded) get held before manual mod approval?
Bingo!
Yes I report them but it's like playing wac a mole.
It's heavily morphed.
Anastasia Korableva. This was the pic. Look at it closely and tell me you think it's unmodified.
Kindly identify your model so that others can check.
If only she decided to work out sheâd look way better.
Qimmah is a perfect example of This but this model (4iP_3iP) is not, the weight difference is way too noticeable here she looks totally different irl very skinny zero muscle even when flexed.. she doesnât belong.
It's sad that people still don't realize the power of perspective, light and shadow, and in this case, the banal tension of muscles and their volume at a particular moment in time. This girl doesn't set a goal to have noticeable muscles all year round. She or the photographer just decided to emphasize her leg muscles, for which she stood on her toes, obviously a favorable perspective was chosen and light and shadow was applied to enhance the effect. If we had to delete every photo here where these manipulations are carried out, we would lose a good third of the photos. Whether this is good or bad, decide for yourself, but emphasizing volumes, unlike morphs, is legal one way or another
Yeah fair, I just didnât really think it was a morph. She is looking absolutely huge at the moment
But 'muscle_club_vip' doesn't sound like something that defines any official source from the model? Good chance the account uploader isn't paying attention to morphs?
Yeah but without the bit at the end
What telegram? muscle_club_vip_bot, or something else?
Well itâs from telegram. Her own one
That's not an answer.
Tbf, looking at her recent pics and vids on here, she does look that big
Well yeah, looking at the full pic it appears to be unquestionably morphed and/or AI-"enhanced". Provide a link to where you got it from if you want to claim otherwise.
Thanks for providing reference data PP1000.
After careful examination, I can confirm those leg muscles are heavily edited.
Her picture on November 2nd shows no muscular development in the hamstrings or calves.
The "Brazilian Miku" photo also highlights a glaring absence of musculature.
Finally, this video.
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.