I think all three belong here, and I say this as someone who is most drawn towards the extremes of muscularity. 1 especially, I could probably count on one hand the number of times I've seen a woman with shoulders like that outside a gym. For 2 and 3, the case might be different if they weren't showcasing their muscles (for instance, if there was a photo that resembled a still at 0:01 for the video of 3), but I think "sleeper builds" showing off their muscles should have a place here. Also, Anastasiia has fantastic abs, she definitely belongs.
It can also be useful from a historical perspective; if any of these athletes "blows up", it is interesting to have a chronological record of their progression. For instance, it's cool that we've got this 'borderline' pic of Angela Yeo from 2014:
OK. I think that #2 sasaki__kisaki shouldn't be here. She's not muscular, she's tiny, scrawny and lean. She's trying to be a gravure idol and the breastform that she uses is evidence of that (in other words her fake boobs aren't real fake boobs...LOL).
So that just restarts the question "what is muscular?"
Should Anastasia Mironova be here?
In my opinion Anastasia should be on the site but I have a bias because I like slim strong girls and not bodybuilders... she have almost 1.5k subscriber and over 350 uploads so there are a lot of user that like her but I agree what the mods said that beautiful girls can be popular without beeing muscular...
In my opinion every muscular group should be appreciated, Anastasia don't have much upper or lower body muscle but she have great abs so she should stay on the site
Thank you for your feedback, I see that most of you agree that sigmawiktoria123 with 29 ok and 2 no.
sasaki__kisaki at the moment is 18 ok and 13 no.
White Bvnny at the moment is 11 ok and 16 no. She already have content uploaded on the site by Ninjabrillo: White Bvnny.
what I'm understanding is that "enough muscolar" depends a lot on what the video is showing and not only on the subject of it, as I was interpreting before. So a girl can be "enough muscolar" in a video/pic with a good lighting but not in a different one.
I also often consider strenght when I think about what to upload. Some of you asked for more content of some of the girls to better evaluate your choice.
sasaki__kisaki in almost all of her video pose the same way but this is a clip more focused on flexing abs:
White Bvnny I thought was ok not only because she already had pictures uploaded on the site but also because strenght is a factor for me, even if it doesn't directly realte to definition. That's a video of her curling 12.5 kg in each hand, that's not bad for a girl of her size:
Today I had a chat with the Site Moderators about content deletion. The site's upload rules that we all know are as follow:
No nudity. No adult content.
No images from female muscle paysites.
No cropping of watermarks.
No images of minors (under 18).
No images of trans women. There is a Trans Women section for this.
No morphs (photoshopped images). There is a Fantasy section for this.
No blacklisted models.
and there are more "secondary rules" that we should follow and that can get content deleted:
Women showing very little visible muscularity.
Images lacking femininity.
Images where the focus is breasts or butt rather than muscles.
High implants-to-muscle ratio.
Contest pictures or pictures with contest tans.
Highlight reel clips.
Maybe some of you know my uploads. I tend to prefer, and upload, the content of athletic/bikini fitness girl compared to physique female bodybuilding that need to have at least some degree of muscularity, as these are girls with muscle after all. However that caused some problems and sometimes (not often) I recive notifications about the content that I uploaded getting deleted for "Not enough visible muscolarity".
With this premisis I would like to create space where users can discuss about what's the borderline between fitness and muscular
a place where users can upload images that we are unsure if they meet the criteria of "enough visible muscolarity"
so that the Site Moderators don't have to take them down after they get reported. If the image we propose gets approved, it can later be uploaded to the main site.
I will start with 3 exemple of what I'm talking about. These are 3 different girls that I think can be considered borderline. For me all three of them are suitable for the site but I would like to hear your opinion:
sigmawiktoria123
sasaki__kisaki
White Bvnny
Of course this post should go above personal preferences. If you are only into bodybuilding you would not like my uploads and that's totally fine but try to think about in general the passion for fit woman.
I'm eager to see your feedbacks.
1 and 3. 2 doesnβt look well. To much implantat. Abs for sure, but arms and lags?
Many pics on the site are contest or contest tann. And lack femininity.
Joelle Smith is 5'8. I know she went missing about ten years ago, but she is one of my all time faves. Best abs ever! Karina Grau is 5'4, and I think Autumn Cleveland is 5'2, and Wendy Fortino is 5'1. Another shock Ms Sanzo only 5' omg! Actually nearly all of these women are shorter than I imagined. Great thread, keep it going
Joelle Smith is 5'8. I know she went missing about ten years ago, but she is one of my all time faves. Best abs ever! Karina Grau is 5'4, and I think Autumn Cleveland is 5'2, and Wendy Fortino is 5'1. Another shock Ms Sanzo only 5' omg! Actually nearly all of these women are shorter than I imagined. Great thread, keep it going
I think all three belong here, and I say this as someone who is most drawn towards the extremes of muscularity. 1 especially, I could probably count on one hand the number of times I've seen a woman with shoulders like that outside a gym. For 2 and 3, the case might be different if they weren't showcasing their muscles (for instance, if there was a photo that resembled a still at 0:01 for the video of 3), but I think "sleeper builds" showing off their muscles should have a place here. Also, Anastasiia has fantastic abs, she definitely belongs.
It can also be useful from a historical perspective; if any of these athletes "blows up", it is interesting to have a chronological record of their progression. For instance, it's cool that we've got this 'borderline' pic of Angela Yeo from 2014:
Hi, I've been searching the forum and hasn't found this theme yet. This post is meant for half body and full body hands behind head abs posts.
The girl at 0:55 is the definition of a stick with abs but who is she ? https://youtu.be/TPEaUCPzSF8?si=L3uL3iVz5XTkiKoN
In bikini : https://youtu.be/8A-z3ocn36M?si=NYgLf8vJUCBbq2Xw
In my opinion Anastasia should be on the site but I have a bias because I like slim strong girls and not bodybuilders... she have almost 1.5k subscriber and over 350 uploads so there are a lot of user that like her but I agree what the mods said that beautiful girls can be popular without beeing muscular...
In my opinion every muscular group should be appreciated, Anastasia don't have much upper or lower body muscle but she have great abs so she should stay on the site
Personally, I'd like to see something where the girl's stomach goes from seemingly flat to rock hard abs
Thank you for your feedback, I see that most of you agree that sigmawiktoria123 with 29 ok and 2 no.
sasaki__kisaki at the moment is 18 ok and 13 no.
White Bvnny at the moment is 11 ok and 16 no. She already have content uploaded on the site by Ninjabrillo: White Bvnny.
what I'm understanding is that "enough muscolar" depends a lot on what the video is showing and not only on the subject of it, as I was interpreting before. So a girl can be "enough muscolar" in a video/pic with a good lighting but not in a different one.
I also often consider strenght when I think about what to upload. Some of you asked for more content of some of the girls to better evaluate your choice.
sasaki__kisaki in almost all of her video pose the same way but this is a clip more focused on flexing abs:
White Bvnny I thought was ok not only because she already had pictures uploaded on the site but also because strenght is a factor for me, even if it doesn't directly realte to definition. That's a video of her curling 12.5 kg in each hand, that's not bad for a girl of her size:
1 and 3. 2 doesnβt look well. To much implantat. Abs for sure, but arms and lags?
Many pics on the site are contest or contest tann. And lack femininity.
Feet too! πππ
There is a tag called symmetrical abs now
Kim has amazing abs and pretty close to perfectly symmetrical
Linking their names would be helpful
Girls in this pose flexing quads and abs but having a more relaxed looking upper body, looking for more examples of poses like this
First photo is Kiki vhyce Second photo is Samantha jerring
Leni Klum abs
You made it easy bro,
Link for any modifications
Joelle Smith is 5'8. I know she went missing about ten years ago, but she is one of my all time faves. Best abs ever! Karina Grau is 5'4, and I think Autumn Cleveland is 5'2, and Wendy Fortino is 5'1. Another shock Ms Sanzo only 5' omg! Actually nearly all of these women are shorter than I imagined. Great thread, keep it going
Got some bigggg boobs and thic abs in this hot tub
its not muscle.... but it looks like muscle. Hot asff in my opinion. I like that you cant tell when shes got the abs showing through the dress....
Can your gf / wife do any of the following ab control? If so, do they let you get pics/vids?
Alanah Yukich flexing and counting her abs on live
This and ab veins are the absolute hottest.
ππ»
Nope. Her abs are clearly results of a liposuction and everything else is just fat.
Can you consider her as a girl with muscle, What's your take on her abs and thighs?
Her IG