You just don't, because it doesn't do anything. Approximately 0 people who fill out the name field do it only because there's a comment saying "name?" under a pic.
(Also in the future I would appreciate you putting your replies into a single post rather than bumping the thread 4 times)
If you are trying to convince me that the filter has been a net negative, saying "the filter blocked my [generic low-effort comment that it was designed to block]!" is not exactly the foolproof argument you imagine it to be...
To the filter detractors, let me turn this around on you. The overall attitude I am getting from you is that you feel entitled to post any and all thoughts onto the site, no matter how inane or uninteresting they may be to other users. So: why should you get to do this? Why should you get to cheaply bump images to the front page and spam people with notifications for your comment that took zero thought and less than a second to type out?
Sorry for this the filter seems not to work , seen a lot of this NAME comment recently
There used to be an exception in the filter to be more permissive when you were asking for the name because I thought that was a useful type of comment, but I now think I was wrong about that, so I have removed this exception.
I tried to comment-- "Wow, muscles, pretty face, AND a huge nerd. What more could a man want?" Tried three times with different words, couldn't get it accepted.
> This will be interesting. Soon there will be a flood of complaints asking why 🍆💦 isn't allowed.
As there should be. Free expression is the hallmark of a free society. All I see here is an eggplant and 3 drops of water. Gee, are we going to be offended by that? It is time to grow a skin.
This will be interesting. Soon there will be a flood of complaints asking why 🍆💦 isn't allowed.
As there should be. Free expression is the hallmark of a free society. All I see here is an eggplant and 3 drops of water. Gee, are we going to be offended by that? It is time to grow a skin.
What should the comment section be used for instead?
Based on a small sample of today's comments
"Also — does anyone know her TikTok or Insta?"
"In awe of that flat chest, no fat whatsoever!"
"What a gorgeous smile - looks fun. So great to see that with such a great arm."
"She's braced against the edge of the table and he's not braced against anything. Even if she wasn't all that strong, I'd suggest he wouldn't have a great chance, giving away such an advantage."
"Great biceps"
"This woman is 24?? I don't believe it lol"
"She's the best the muscle world has to offer right now, at this age 👍🏻🤘💪🏽"
"Oh my god it feels like Nikki is going to snap her neck"
"Wow, that's a nice comparison! She's really big... can't believe those arms."
This got rejected. I gave up after the third reiteration of that comment. Would this comment be a nuisance to the comunity? What should the comment section be used for instead?
Log in |
Register
You just don't, because it doesn't do anything. Approximately 0 people who fill out the name field do it only because there's a comment saying "name?" under a pic.
(Also in the future I would appreciate you putting your replies into a single post rather than bumping the thread 4 times)
If you are trying to convince me that the filter has been a net negative, saying "the filter blocked my [generic low-effort comment that it was designed to block]!" is not exactly the foolproof argument you imagine it to be...
To the filter detractors, let me turn this around on you. The overall attitude I am getting from you is that you feel entitled to post any and all thoughts onto the site, no matter how inane or uninteresting they may be to other users. So: why should you get to do this? Why should you get to cheaply bump images to the front page and spam people with notifications for your comment that took zero thought and less than a second to type out?
There used to be an exception in the filter to be more permissive when you were asking for the name because I thought that was a useful type of comment, but I now think I was wrong about that, so I have removed this exception.
Just reading Zarklephaser's mental gymnastics to rationalize the filter is entertaining.
You vying for a mod position, Zark?
I tried to tell Chainer that an arbitrary comment filter would be a disaster.
It's also a bad data management strategy. Comment data is extremely valuable for future analysis and tagging, you don't want to mess with it.
The idea to sanitize the comments on a site like this is also silly.
It is unacceptable and ridiculous to pretend to know what the other person thinks.
I replied to a Noof Yusuf image with "Sexy and she knows it!" Not acceptable. Ridiculous.
On Kittybitcosplay's pic
I tried to comment-- "Wow, muscles, pretty face, AND a huge nerd. What more could a man want?" Tried three times with different words, couldn't get it accepted.
Thanks for the laugh!
Sorry for this the filter seems not to work , seen a lot of this NAME comment recently
As there should be. Free expression is the hallmark of a free society. All I see here is an eggplant and 3 drops of water. Gee, are we going to be offended by that? It is time to grow a skin.
Yeah, maybe "wow" is getting filtered? Filter is working great. Thank you anyways.
Based on a small sample of today's comments
I'd say the answer is "pretty much anything".
"Wow, that's a nice comparison! She's really big... can't believe those arms."
This got rejected. I gave up after the third reiteration of that comment. Would this comment be a nuisance to the comunity? What should the comment section be used for instead?