A few notes about this:

• A poll can have up to 10 choices and you can choose for it to be multiple choice or no.
• If you vote on a poll, you can later change your vote.
• Make sure to proofread your poll because currently it is not editable once you have created your thread. If you mess up you'll have to delete the thread and start over.
• Same rules apply to polls as to normal threads. No low-effort fantasy/fetish polls.
• Currently polls close to voting 2 weeks after the thread was created.
• Before creating a poll do a search to see if a very similar poll has been posted recently, just as you should be doing with threads.
• Your votes are anonymous to the public but they are associated with your user account in the database so I could look them up if I wanted to.

Thanks Chainer.

Just checked my list of subbed models and it's frightening. Pages of them. I really have to cut it down. It would be nice to see a total of (a) how many I'm subscribed to and (b) number of subscribers for each girl on the same list. I'd love to know if I'm following the herd or if I have niche tastes. 🙂

It's the new page, I think. I was wondering too, but I noticed there's a new page showing a list of subbed models, separate from the notifications

Yes...works great. As soon as one of your subscribed muscle girls has a new upload...boom. you get notified, if you're signed in or once you sign in.

Sorry. I'm missing what it is that's different. Don't we already get a notification that there are uploads when we sign in? The exclamation mark at the top? Am I getting an email now or something? Or is this a way to list everyone you're subscribed to?

It's the new page, I think. I was wondering too, but I noticed there's a new page showing a list of subbed models, separate from the notifications

Sorry. I'm missing what it is that's different. Don't we already get a notification that there are uploads when we sign in? The exclamation mark at the top? Am I getting an email now or something? Or is this a way to list everyone you're subscribed to?

@Chainer...fantastic new tool for the site. Lets everyone know when their favorites have something new for them to see. Thank you Chainer. I love it. 👍👍

Thanks, this is great!!

Worthless comments are also unacceptable. There is no useful commentary taking place. Locking the thread unless Chainer deems it necessary to keep it open.

Please don't bump threads multiple times if no one else has replied. In the future you can edit your comment to condense your replies.

> > You would think so. He is completely insufferable.

No. You are. I hope that this is the intent of the filter.

I quite like the idea of pulling eachothers comment history to trash talk. After examining my own, I'd like to start with myself:

It's clear I just want the sauce, man

My objection about "Name?" is that all too often, someone inquires about the name, and then a bunch of other folks ask the same question. Maybe they think that there is strength in numbers or something. There's no reason to ask a question (any question) more than once. Personally, I almost never ask about a name since if I am just patient, someone will often fill it in eventually. And, do I really need to know a woman's name? No, not at all.

Well, the strength in numbers sometimes is about keeping the post in the recently commented section I guess, or reviving an old forgotten unknown. I have seen masive community detective efforts carried out to tag certain girls in this way. At the end of the day you don't have to really really know a name, but I guess one of the purposes of this site is to be an organized database and if they all were unknowns this would basically be Pinterest.

The comment filter does not consider other people's comments at all when deciding whether to allow yours through.

Clearly, but it considers yours, even when deleted. Anyway, don't wanna push this further as I'm sure there's more reasons for it working on deleted comments too than not.

My main plea was for asking for names on different posts.

The filter doesn't actually block you from asking for the name. It just no longer has a specific exception that makes it extra permissive for those types of comments.

My objection about "Name?" is that all too often, someone inquires about the name, and then a bunch of other folks ask the same question. Maybe they think that there is strength in numbers or something. There's no reason to ask a question (any question) more than once. Personally, I almost never ask about a name since if I am just patient, someone will often fill it in eventually. And, do I really need to know a woman's name? No, not at all.

The comment filter does not consider other people's comments at all when deciding whether to allow yours through.

The filter doesn't actually block you from asking for the name. It just no longer has a specific exception that makes it extra permissive for those types of comments.

But I suppose it takes into account if you asked previously in a certain timeframe. Does it consider deleted comments too?

Yesterday I asked who someone was. Then found out myself, returned to the original post, tagged her and removed my comment.

Later I found myself on another post, wanted to ask the magic question but couldn't, no matter how I phrased it or how much other stuff I said. Surely enough, in the meantime someone asked "Who's this".

The filter doesn't actually block you from asking for the name. It just no longer has a specific exception that makes it extra permissive for those types of comments.

You just don't, because it doesn't do anything. Approximately 0 people who fill out the name field do it only because there's a comment saying "name?" under a pic.

(Also in the future I would appreciate you putting your replies into a single post rather than bumping the thread 4 times)

Maybe it's not an incentive alone for someone to start researching but I think it shows people are interested and sometimes it kickstarts debates.

"Who is the?"

"She looks like X"

"Nah, can't be X, she's too tall. Maybe an older picture of Y?"

There's also mysterious posters like tempp who put the first name in the name of the picture (indicating they probably know the full name or a tag) and I always hoped it would at least be seen by them.

You would think so. He is completely insufferable.

Pot meet kettle in this whole thread 🙄

Just reading Zarklephaser's mental gymnastics to rationalize the filter is entertaining.

You vying for a mod position, Zark?

You would think so. He is completely insufferable.