Her arms are just ridiculous!
Her arms are bigger too
Lucky photographer for sure! 🥵🥵🥵
Holy heck those arms
Simply unbelievable
Whoofff armwrestling with her arms would be very tough
Built! 💪😍
Dominant princess!
How is this even possible?
So strong!
Damn. Who is this?
I would like to give her an oily massage
These are just a few of the recent comments which all meet the "minimum quality requirements"...
Firstly, there really is something below (see "Bug in the 'minimum quality threshold'"). Secondly, my comments are certainly not more stupid than others, and at least I know how to write the word "biceps" (many other users don't). When somebody writes: "Wow, what a woman!" or "Sexy like hell", that is also not very intelligent, is it?
However, I think the focus in this forum is not to give "intelligent" comments but to express admiration. I do this by saying that I'd like to feel how strong she is - that's the meaning of "headlock victim". Maybe nobody misses that, but it hasn't disturbed anyone up to now.
When I have some time, I'll look out for some "intelligent" comments in this forum which meet the minimum quality threshold and post them here... :-)
Never mind what my comment on a pic is like, I always get the message that "it doesn't meet the minimum quality threshold". However, when other users write "sexy like hell" or something like that, this obviously meets the minimum quality threshold. How can that be true?
Hi there! Could be a misunderstanding on my part rather than a bug but here goes. Last month I started using the great subscription feature. But once or twice now I've had new notifications of new images for models but then not seen anything new. For example today I logged in and saw a notification of a new image for the model "Hanner" but then when I went to the page no new image.
This thread is no longer about bugs in the filter but rather about reasons why you don't like the way it works, so I'm locking this and redirecting to the other thread: https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...
If you notice something that you think is actually an unintended bug in the filter, please open another thread in this section.
I swear to god, haiku is the way. I HATE haiku, it is the worst form of poetry, but you gotta do what you gotta do.
EDIT: I gotta say I am curious about the algorithm being used for this. My curiosity is genuine. I could write paragraphs explaining why but it would really be TLTR. I entered a contest recently, we lost, and I am sort of glad that we did because the next step would be to design a traffic stop that could teach people how to drive. I wouldn't even know how to start.
It's because you comment a lot and are very repetitive in your commenting, whereas the same is probably not true for the other user. It isn't about writing longer comments.
So "giant arms" meets the minimum criteria. That's ridiculous.
It's because you comment a lot and are very repetitive in your commenting, whereas the same is probably not true for the other user. It isn't about writing longer comments.
This filter is so screwed up, it's ridiculous!!! On a Luisa Texiera curling clip, the first poster writes Giant arms 🥰🥰🥰. That didn't meet any minimum but was allowed. I wrote 3 lines, complimenting her biceps, the great pump she was achieving, her desire to get bigger and looking forward to her journey. This along with several previous attempts were all rejected. This filter is so stupid and screwed up. No consistency to it at all!!!
Thanks Chainer! I'll be sure to presume that I'm guilty until deemed innocent from here on out Also didn't realize that you considered my comments so very trite & boring. Guess we have a mutual regard about one another. No more comments from me now on - I don't want to upset your mind control policy.......
I looked at your rejected comments and honestly, I agree with the rejection of many of them. For example:
"She is very lovely!"
"Muscular perfection"
"Very profound!"
"Marvelous muscularity!"
"Beautiful fit body!"
I feel like a great deal of pain with the filter could be avoided if people just asked themselves, "Could this comment I am about to post fit under literally every single picture on the site?" and if the answer is "yes", don't post it.
I should note that despite a bunch of your comments getting rejected, you did manage to sneak many very similar ones past the filter anyway, which is the main reason why these got rejected, since the filter punishes repetitiveness.
There are some comments you made like "Magnificent leg muscularity!" which at least reference something useful about the picture that someone could search for, but even then, you could just apply the "leg" tag and it would be at least as useful as this comment. In your particular case, this comment got rejected because of your repetitive comments in quick succession.
After going through your existing comments, here are some good ones I found:
"Pioneer US FBB from the early/mid 1980s RIP age 50 2003" - tells us background about the person
"Former NYC fashion model turned FBB competitor" - same thing
"@ourgang She is 34 years old (Birthdate: 13 June 1988) & an IFBB Physique competitor from Denmark (152 lbs - competition weight; 167 lbs - off-season) - a Lithuanian emigre to Denmark some years ago." - same thing
Not every single one of your comments has to be like this, and the filter is meant to allow some amount of compliments that reference the picture in question, but the more general and repetitive your comments, the more likely the filter is to get you, and this is intentional.
Experienced least 30 plus MQT turndowns so far today. Excuse the H out of me for trying to say something positive & complimentary! Maybe I should be posting negative an/or derogatory comments instead? Again tell us what specific positive comments are "too general, repetitive and meaningless?" Meaningless? Really? By what standards! Insulting to commenters!
It's back again! Have had 8 consecutive very complimentary comments (along with one typo correction where the original comment was approved) that were denied in the past 30 minutes!
Log in |
Register
These are just a few of the recent comments which all meet the "minimum quality requirements"...
Firstly, there really is something below (see "Bug in the 'minimum quality threshold'"). Secondly, my comments are certainly not more stupid than others, and at least I know how to write the word "biceps" (many other users don't). When somebody writes: "Wow, what a woman!" or "Sexy like hell", that is also not very intelligent, is it? However, I think the focus in this forum is not to give "intelligent" comments but to express admiration. I do this by saying that I'd like to feel how strong she is - that's the meaning of "headlock victim". Maybe nobody misses that, but it hasn't disturbed anyone up to now. When I have some time, I'll look out for some "intelligent" comments in this forum which meet the minimum quality threshold and post them here... :-)
The man loves his headlocks lol.
I just noticed that it happens to other users, too (see below).
Never mind what my comment on a pic is like, I always get the message that "it doesn't meet the minimum quality threshold". However, when other users write "sexy like hell" or something like that, this obviously meets the minimum quality threshold. How can that be true?
Ah, ok. Makes sense. Thanks for the info!
Because the pic/video has been deleted or merged
Hi there! Could be a misunderstanding on my part rather than a bug but here goes. Last month I started using the great subscription feature. But once or twice now I've had new notifications of new images for models but then not seen anything new. For example today I logged in and saw a notification of a new image for the model "Hanner" but then when I went to the page no new image.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Thanks, should be fixed now.
Has anyone else got an issue with the chat room? All I get is
Connecting... Unable to connect. Reconnecting in 10s... Connecting... Unable to connect. Reconnecting in 10s...
Until it times out and goes back to the main room.
This thread is no longer about bugs in the filter but rather about reasons why you don't like the way it works, so I'm locking this and redirecting to the other thread: https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...
If you notice something that you think is actually an unintended bug in the filter, please open another thread in this section.
The filter should have known to ban it based on what?
So much strife, much grief
You lot should look at some girls
With hot muscle feet
I swear to god, haiku is the way. I HATE haiku, it is the worst form of poetry, but you gotta do what you gotta do.
EDIT: I gotta say I am curious about the algorithm being used for this. My curiosity is genuine. I could write paragraphs explaining why but it would really be TLTR. I entered a contest recently, we lost, and I am sort of glad that we did because the next step would be to design a traffic stop that could teach people how to drive. I wouldn't even know how to start.
So "giant arms" meets the minimum criteria. That's ridiculous.
It's because you comment a lot and are very repetitive in your commenting, whereas the same is probably not true for the other user. It isn't about writing longer comments.
This filter is so screwed up, it's ridiculous!!! On a Luisa Texiera curling clip, the first poster writes Giant arms 🥰🥰🥰. That didn't meet any minimum but was allowed. I wrote 3 lines, complimenting her biceps, the great pump she was achieving, her desire to get bigger and looking forward to her journey. This along with several previous attempts were all rejected. This filter is so stupid and screwed up. No consistency to it at all!!!
Thanks Chainer! I'll be sure to presume that I'm guilty until deemed innocent from here on out Also didn't realize that you considered my comments so very trite & boring. Guess we have a mutual regard about one another. No more comments from me now on - I don't want to upset your mind control policy.......
I looked at your rejected comments and honestly, I agree with the rejection of many of them. For example:
I feel like a great deal of pain with the filter could be avoided if people just asked themselves, "Could this comment I am about to post fit under literally every single picture on the site?" and if the answer is "yes", don't post it.
I should note that despite a bunch of your comments getting rejected, you did manage to sneak many very similar ones past the filter anyway, which is the main reason why these got rejected, since the filter punishes repetitiveness.
There are some comments you made like "Magnificent leg muscularity!" which at least reference something useful about the picture that someone could search for, but even then, you could just apply the "leg" tag and it would be at least as useful as this comment. In your particular case, this comment got rejected because of your repetitive comments in quick succession.
After going through your existing comments, here are some good ones I found:
Not every single one of your comments has to be like this, and the filter is meant to allow some amount of compliments that reference the picture in question, but the more general and repetitive your comments, the more likely the filter is to get you, and this is intentional.
Experienced least 30 plus MQT turndowns so far today. Excuse the H out of me for trying to say something positive & complimentary! Maybe I should be posting negative an/or derogatory comments instead? Again tell us what specific positive comments are "too general, repetitive and meaningless?" Meaningless? Really? By what standards! Insulting to commenters!
That's a good way to introduce yourself.
It's what we want!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Md_nDXAOZ8
It's back again! Have had 8 consecutive very complimentary comments (along with one typo correction where the original comment was approved) that were denied in the past 30 minutes!
Must have been made by chainer 🤣