I don't believe the one of Veronica is morphed in any way. It's straight from a video.
I don't think he was referring to morphage. He's saying the last two are stretching the limits of who qualify. I stand by Kim Drizzle though. I've seen others nominated with biceps half as good as hers! 💪
The thing is the GWM we see online are a very small portion (maybe 10%) of all the muscular women in the world. These are the ones that either compete or like showing off on social media.
I've always had 2-3 girls in each class that are muscular in high school and university. In high school they were soccer players or skaters with tree trunk quads, or ballerina with massive calves, or swimmers with beefy backs. In university they were rock climbers with huge biceps and forearms. All of these are women I've personally interacted with, but they never post on social media so nobody knows about them.
Working as cashier in a grocery store, I'd say 15-20% of women were bigger/stronger than the average man. Some just naturally built that muscle by carrying their own groceries over the years, some were nurses, warehouses workers, or firefighters (physically demanding jobs), and a few were obviously competing.
Using this as my basis, in my city alone (population 1 million), thats 15k-20k muscular women. This website has maybe like 2k. The examples I gave from real life are mostly natural, there's no reason for most of those to take PEDs, except for the few that competed in bodybuilding events.
My point is this website is only showing the ones that either bodybuild or influencers on social media, the ones who need PEDs to keep up with the competition. But from my experience, in real life, most muscular women don't compete and aren't influencers, they just simply happened to play a sport or work a job that naturally developed their muscles over the years.
So the claim that the majority of muscular women use PEDs is disingenuous since this is a very small sample size compared to what exists in the world.
I realize I'm speaking entirely from my perspective, maybe it's just my area that's like this. But when I went to Egypt last year, I found it was the same thing there. So I'm inclined to believe that it's the same way everywhere.
Side note, I also did some research a few years ago and found 4-5 research papers on this topic. Those studies showed women are much more capable of developing muscles than is widely believed. Estrogen increases the effectiveness of GH, test, and androgen. They produce more natural GH than men do, and they have another hormone that speeds up recovery. so they still have a high capacity for building muscle despite the low amount of male hormone because there's alot more that goes into building muscle than just that.
I agree. I knew 2 girls in high school who had very developed muscles. One was a gymnast and one was a majorette. The majorette, from carrying that heavy stick developed incredible shoulders and biceps. We were friends. One day out of the blue she and I were talking and out of nowhere rolled up her sleeve and flexed her bicep for me and said look at this from just being a majorette. I was floored. She said feel it and I did, it was so hard and developed. Women can develop muscles if they workout. Maybe not to the degree of a man but they can get strong and their muscles can be hard. The gymnast also had incredible arms. I knew her well also, actually felt her flexed bicep one day but just saying that her arms looked strong and she flexed her arm and let me feel it. Needless to say it was so hard and round.
While some of your numbers are way off (this site has much more than 2K women featured, and the grocery store experience is going to differ for everyone... your encounter rate seems much higher than average), your point still stands.
So here's a curveball. Do we just want the "biggest" peak or most aesthetically pleasing with size?..i.e best complimentary flow?
I'm not looking for measurements or anything, so yes you could say the most aesthetically pleasing. The only stipulation I would add is that she needs to also have at least noticeable muscle development everywhere else. I'm not going to include for example girls with stick arms just because they have a defined bicep bump.
Also keep in mind that there are only 10 slots to fill (the site's poll limit) and so I'll likely narrow it down to names that seem to be the most popular.
There've been a load of competitions in Europe somewhat similar to this down the years (though much less flashy and with much fewer competitors) and nearly all the challenges are endurance, puzzle or obstacle based. Baffling that they thought that hold the ball challenge was good idea if they want the competition to have any integrity. There was really nothing to stop all the guys just picking to go up against women and get a free pass to the next round?
Really hope we get some kind of isometric hold challenge before the end. Then you get to really see the fight of these athletes and the women would be in with an excellent chance of winning.
Fully caught up on watching episodes properly now, it's going to be very interesting to see how An Da Jeong copes in the next challenge.
Some of the more conventional athletes were exhausted after the 12 minutes of packing and carrying sand, and it's tough to imagine her stamina holding up particularly well.
If she's out we'll always have the clip of her tackling and ripping the ball away from that smaller girl she was matched up against, and then celebrating with the double bi flex (episode 3, 19 mins)
Big traps with sloping shoulders. Where they form an upside down V shape.
And even though I find fake boobs unattractive, the effect some FBBs get when they flex their pecs and their boobs separate almost going into their armpits, that I find weirdly hot. A few get this effect even without implants, like Virginia Clover.
It's so out of the way that it is completely out of mind for me. I think GOW should be whose picture sat longest at the highest score spot that week.
Anyway, I think all listed main page features are good and I would not want any of them to go away. But my favorite is recommended, because almost always there will be a low scoring gem there that I'd have missed otherwise.
Sometimes a feat of strength can be hot, but strength without the aesthetics means nothing to me. Aesthetics without strength work just as fine, if not better because it fits my biologically programmed male protector role if she is still girly weak.
The thing is the GWM we see online are a very small portion (maybe 10%) of all the muscular women in the world. These are the ones that either compete or like showing off on social media.
I've always had 2-3 girls in each class that are muscular in high school and university. In high school they were soccer players or skaters with tree trunk quads, or ballerina with massive calves, or swimmers with beefy backs. In university they were rock climbers with huge biceps and forearms. All of these are women I've personally interacted with, but they never post on social media so nobody knows about them.
Working as cashier in a grocery store, I'd say 15-20% of women were bigger/stronger than the average man. Some just naturally built that muscle by carrying their own groceries over the years, some were nurses, warehouses workers, or firefighters (physically demanding jobs), and a few were obviously competing.
Using this as my basis, in my city alone (population 1 million), thats 15k-20k muscular women. This website has maybe like 2k. The examples I gave from real life are mostly natural, there's no reason for most of those to take PEDs, except for the few that competed in bodybuilding events.
My point is this website is only showing the ones that either bodybuild or influencers on social media, the ones who need PEDs to keep up with the competition. But from my experience, in real life, most muscular women don't compete and aren't influencers, they just simply happened to play a sport or work a job that naturally developed their muscles over the years.
So the claim that the majority of muscular women use PEDs is disingenuous since this is a very small sample size compared to what exists in the world.
I realize I'm speaking entirely from my perspective, maybe it's just my area that's like this. But when I went to Egypt last year, I found it was the same thing there. So I'm inclined to believe that it's the same way everywhere.
Side note, I also did some research a few years ago and found 4-5 research papers on this topic. Those studies showed women are much more capable of developing muscles than is widely believed. Estrogen increases the effectiveness of GH, test, and androgen. They produce more natural GH than men do, and they have another hormone that speeds up recovery. so they still have a high capacity for building muscle despite the low amount of male hormone because there's alot more that goes into building muscle than just that.
Log in |
Register
Danni Teresa
I don't think he was referring to morphage. He's saying the last two are stretching the limits of who qualify. I stand by Kim Drizzle though. I've seen others nominated with biceps half as good as hers! 💪
I don't believe the one of Veronica is morphed in any way. It's straight from a video.
The last two makes my suspicion real. Blurring the limits.
Veronica Valentyne is not a big woman, but among those with smaller arms, her peak certainly stands out!
I agree. I knew 2 girls in high school who had very developed muscles. One was a gymnast and one was a majorette. The majorette, from carrying that heavy stick developed incredible shoulders and biceps. We were friends. One day out of the blue she and I were talking and out of nowhere rolled up her sleeve and flexed her bicep for me and said look at this from just being a majorette. I was floored. She said feel it and I did, it was so hard and developed. Women can develop muscles if they workout. Maybe not to the degree of a man but they can get strong and their muscles can be hard. The gymnast also had incredible arms. I knew her well also, actually felt her flexed bicep one day but just saying that her arms looked strong and she flexed her arm and let me feel it. Needless to say it was so hard and round.
Suha Qasem beats ALL!
There are no absolutes.
While some of your numbers are way off (this site has much more than 2K women featured, and the grocery store experience is going to differ for everyone... your encounter rate seems much higher than average), your point still stands.
I'm not looking for measurements or anything, so yes you could say the most aesthetically pleasing. The only stipulation I would add is that she needs to also have at least noticeable muscle development everywhere else. I'm not going to include for example girls with stick arms just because they have a defined bicep bump.
Also keep in mind that there are only 10 slots to fill (the site's poll limit) and so I'll likely narrow it down to names that seem to be the most popular.
There've been a load of competitions in Europe somewhat similar to this down the years (though much less flashy and with much fewer competitors) and nearly all the challenges are endurance, puzzle or obstacle based. Baffling that they thought that hold the ball challenge was good idea if they want the competition to have any integrity. There was really nothing to stop all the guys just picking to go up against women and get a free pass to the next round?
Really hope we get some kind of isometric hold challenge before the end. Then you get to really see the fight of these athletes and the women would be in with an excellent chance of winning.
Lenka Ferencukova
Fully caught up on watching episodes properly now, it's going to be very interesting to see how An Da Jeong copes in the next challenge.
Some of the more conventional athletes were exhausted after the 12 minutes of packing and carrying sand, and it's tough to imagine her stamina holding up particularly well.
If she's out we'll always have the clip of her tackling and ripping the ball away from that smaller girl she was matched up against, and then celebrating with the double bi flex (episode 3, 19 mins)
Big traps with sloping shoulders. Where they form an upside down V shape.
And even though I find fake boobs unattractive, the effect some FBBs get when they flex their pecs and their boobs separate almost going into their armpits, that I find weirdly hot. A few get this effect even without implants, like Virginia Clover.
Not sure if these biceps fit the criteria, but I find them beautiful and want to add them nevertheless.
Elisabetta Palmieri
Luisa Teixeira
It's so out of the way that it is completely out of mind for me. I think GOW should be whose picture sat longest at the highest score spot that week.
Anyway, I think all listed main page features are good and I would not want any of them to go away. But my favorite is recommended, because almost always there will be a low scoring gem there that I'd have missed otherwise.
Sometimes a feat of strength can be hot, but strength without the aesthetics means nothing to me. Aesthetics without strength work just as fine, if not better because it fits my biologically programmed male protector role if she is still girly weak.
I have had pictures deleted that showed more muscularity. So I'd not say that's underrated.
The thing is the GWM we see online are a very small portion (maybe 10%) of all the muscular women in the world. These are the ones that either compete or like showing off on social media.
I've always had 2-3 girls in each class that are muscular in high school and university. In high school they were soccer players or skaters with tree trunk quads, or ballerina with massive calves, or swimmers with beefy backs. In university they were rock climbers with huge biceps and forearms. All of these are women I've personally interacted with, but they never post on social media so nobody knows about them.
Working as cashier in a grocery store, I'd say 15-20% of women were bigger/stronger than the average man. Some just naturally built that muscle by carrying their own groceries over the years, some were nurses, warehouses workers, or firefighters (physically demanding jobs), and a few were obviously competing.
Using this as my basis, in my city alone (population 1 million), thats 15k-20k muscular women. This website has maybe like 2k. The examples I gave from real life are mostly natural, there's no reason for most of those to take PEDs, except for the few that competed in bodybuilding events.
My point is this website is only showing the ones that either bodybuild or influencers on social media, the ones who need PEDs to keep up with the competition. But from my experience, in real life, most muscular women don't compete and aren't influencers, they just simply happened to play a sport or work a job that naturally developed their muscles over the years.
So the claim that the majority of muscular women use PEDs is disingenuous since this is a very small sample size compared to what exists in the world.
I realize I'm speaking entirely from my perspective, maybe it's just my area that's like this. But when I went to Egypt last year, I found it was the same thing there. So I'm inclined to believe that it's the same way everywhere.
Side note, I also did some research a few years ago and found 4-5 research papers on this topic. Those studies showed women are much more capable of developing muscles than is widely believed. Estrogen increases the effectiveness of GH, test, and androgen. They produce more natural GH than men do, and they have another hormone that speeds up recovery. so they still have a high capacity for building muscle despite the low amount of male hormone because there's alot more that goes into building muscle than just that.
c'monnnnn doesn't everyone know it's charla