Something like that is probably best served by just adding the individual tags working out and sweat. You can then search for images that are tagged with both.
I'd agree with Chainer's sentiment, partly because I see many videos where there is barely a second of muscle reveal, even if it is 10+ seconds long (or whatever feels longer than needs be). I am of the opinion that it is better to trim a video to the essential section, than try being just another YouTube.
It gets annoying to spend a while watching a video, wondering if there is going to be any muscle reveal. I'm of the general sentiment if the video isn't going to show the muscle in the first few seconds, then it is candidate for rejection, partly because I don't have time to give such a video the benefit of the doubt.
Note, originally the videos were meant to be a better alternative to GIFs (from what I remember), both for reasons of quality and because the file sizes would be smaller. Story telling videos weren't really the focus of the move to videos.
Here’s the thing, bodybuilding is expensive and for women your only real way of making money is your looks for guys into it (which is actually a pretty small minority of guys, at least the more bodybuilding focus ladies which are most popular here) so blacklisting this and any other impediments to making money needs to happen.
Don't agree. This is the best advertising platform these hyper narcissistic chicks can get. Then they are able to make money on other plarforms like Onlyfans. If they are not for the money on social media but only for the likes and the dopamin rush (like most young women are) I don't see even less of a problem sharing their Insta and Tiktok content on this site.
I dunno, I'd argue that if you need to give a special explanation for why a picture should be accepted, the picture probably doesn't belong on the site...
The file size of videos needs increasing - modern clips require larger allowance.
I recently argued elsewhere that this is a feature, not a bug. The upload size limit forces you to be judicious with what you upload.
The photo always was a screenshot. It was never released to be downloaded.
An image can always be downloaded, as chipperpip indicates, if you can see it in your browser. If you need some pointers on how to download we are willing to provide advise. For example, there are download tools for Instagram stories, videos and images.
If an image is in queue and someone uploads it directly is it the queued image that gets credit? I feel like it's a mad rush to be "the first" person to upload especially if you ran out of daily uploads and need to put it in the queue.
The id is an upload sequence number, irrespective of whether it went to a queue or directly went live.
The photo always was a screenshot. It was never released to be downloaded.
Trust me, if an image displayed on your device, there's a way to download it directly without taking a screenshot. I assume this was an Instagram Story post or something?
If an image is in queue and someone uploads it directly is it the queued image that gets credit? I feel like it's a mad rush to be "the first" person to upload especially if you ran out of daily uploads and need to put it in the queue.
Yes, it's whichever was uploaded to the site first, regardless of whether it was queued or not.
Additionally yours was a screenshot, which would make it lose whichever the upload order was.
The photo always was a screenshot. It was never released to be downloaded.
*Edit
If an image is in queue and someone uploads it directly is it the queued image that gets credit? I feel like it's a mad rush to be "the first" person to upload especially if you ran out of daily uploads and need to put it in the queue.
was this image in the queue before I uploaded it? My image was first, then it was merged and now I have no credit. That's my cropping of the pic as well.
Rejection of uploads based on image/video quality.
Images & videos from several years ago do not meet modern quality expectations, but should be accepted on historic merit.
The file size of videos needs increasing - modern clips require larger allowance. Quality of video must surely include their length/run time. Often a scene has to be cut to enable the upload, resulting in a poor viewing experience. The quality consideration must allow for uploading a reasonable 'story' with run time.
I suggest it would be a help for the upload REVIEWER if a "dialogue box" was included so the uploader can state why the image should be accepted.
I have had video and images rejected often with no explanation as to why.
My last video of Alina Popa wrestling her Webmaster was to supplement action on a recent upload, but from a second camera position. It never appeared!
Similarly in a recent 'linked' sequence on Nataliya (Amazonka) showing competitors in a "Single Arm Lifting" competition, I had images rejected because the subject didn't show enough muscularity. When compared with Nataliya that was exactly the point I was trying to illustrate!
A dialogue with my upload may have got the GWM Reviewer to accept the upload.
Log in |
Register
Thank you 🙏
I am planning to do this, but it will be after I have released model-level tags.
Yeah I'll probably do that eventually.
My fingers hurt from copying and pasting so many names into google it would be more convenient this way.
Best abs ever, keep coming back to it
Something like that is probably best served by just adding the individual tags working out and sweat. You can then search for images that are tagged with both.
I'd agree with Chainer's sentiment, partly because I see many videos where there is barely a second of muscle reveal, even if it is 10+ seconds long (or whatever feels longer than needs be). I am of the opinion that it is better to trim a video to the essential section, than try being just another YouTube.
It gets annoying to spend a while watching a video, wondering if there is going to be any muscle reveal. I'm of the general sentiment if the video isn't going to show the muscle in the first few seconds, then it is candidate for rejection, partly because I don't have time to give such a video the benefit of the doubt.
Note, originally the videos were meant to be a better alternative to GIFs (from what I remember), both for reasons of quality and because the file sizes would be smaller. Story telling videos weren't really the focus of the move to videos.
A possibility to suscribe to your favourite tags and when they will be updated, the site send you a notification
Ture.
Same she’s probably the only girl whose tattoos fit her body.
Don't agree. This is the best advertising platform these hyper narcissistic chicks can get. Then they are able to make money on other plarforms like Onlyfans. If they are not for the money on social media but only for the likes and the dopamin rush (like most young women are) I don't see even less of a problem sharing their Insta and Tiktok content on this site.
nice one. thank youi
I agree with you. I miss her. I love her tattoos.
I dunno, I'd argue that if you need to give a special explanation for why a picture should be accepted, the picture probably doesn't belong on the site...
I recently argued elsewhere that this is a feature, not a bug. The upload size limit forces you to be judicious with what you upload.
An image can always be downloaded, as chipperpip indicates, if you can see it in your browser. If you need some pointers on how to download we are willing to provide advise. For example, there are download tools for Instagram stories, videos and images.
The id is an upload sequence number, irrespective of whether it went to a queue or directly went live.
Trust me, if an image displayed on your device, there's a way to download it directly without taking a screenshot. I assume this was an Instagram Story post or something?
Yes, it's whichever was uploaded to the site first, regardless of whether it was queued or not.
It's only a mad rush if you're uploading someone who is already very popular, like Dianna.
The photo always was a screenshot. It was never released to be downloaded.
*Edit
If an image is in queue and someone uploads it directly is it the queued image that gets credit? I feel like it's a mad rush to be "the first" person to upload especially if you ran out of daily uploads and need to put it in the queue.
Your image was uploaded second.
Additionally yours was a screenshot, which would make it lose whichever the upload order was.
Rejection of uploads based on image/video quality.
Images & videos from several years ago do not meet modern quality expectations, but should be accepted on historic merit.
The file size of videos needs increasing - modern clips require larger allowance. Quality of video must surely include their length/run time. Often a scene has to be cut to enable the upload, resulting in a poor viewing experience. The quality consideration must allow for uploading a reasonable 'story' with run time.
I suggest it would be a help for the upload REVIEWER if a "dialogue box" was included so the uploader can state why the image should be accepted. I have had video and images rejected often with no explanation as to why. My last video of Alina Popa wrestling her Webmaster was to supplement action on a recent upload, but from a second camera position. It never appeared! Similarly in a recent 'linked' sequence on Nataliya (Amazonka) showing competitors in a "Single Arm Lifting" competition, I had images rejected because the subject didn't show enough muscularity. When compared with Nataliya that was exactly the point I was trying to illustrate! A dialogue with my upload may have got the GWM Reviewer to accept the upload.