Because they're still allowed, and also because being tagged will allow people to exclude them if negative tag searches become a feature in the future? (I assume this is a form of whining about some pic in particular and not an actual serious question)
Contest pictures or pictures with contest tans are "strongly discouraged" in the upload rules so why are you are encouraging them with a tag?.
Because they're still allowed, and also because being tagged will allow people to exclude them if negative tag searches become a feature in the future? (I assume this is a form of whining about some pic in particular and not an actual serious question)
We only want to have one main tag to designate onstage stuff, currently it's "competition", but I'm wondering if I should change that to "contest" instead, to go along with "contest tan". If so, I guess "competition suit" should also be changed to "contest suit" to keep everything consistent?
Does anyone have any thoughts?
Contest pictures or pictures with contest tans are "strongly discouraged" in the upload rules so why are you are encouraging them with a tag?.
Seems like the word "contest" is used more. As in "contest results." But that's just my perception. Worth noting, a competition is suit is a type of bikini.
It is now “bikini/competition suit”, unless anyone has any hard objections.
I am ok with not accepting the upload, it's just that there's literally thousands of other uploads along these lines and they're still up. I mean, my last few are literally the same thing and they were accepted.
According to the thumbnail, it's now also uploaded from someone else.
I am ok with not accepting the upload, it's just that there's literally thousands of other uploads along these lines and they're still up. I mean, my last few are literally the same thing and they were accepted.
I'm not going to argue the ethics of having race tags, however to put nationality tags on top of that is just ridiculous to me. There's a limited number of tags you can have and now it seems that by default two ethnicity tags are in every pic. This is just useless waste of space
I'm seeing incorrect assumptions already. Someone made an ethnicity/nationality assignment based on a married name. Example A: Carrie Goforth-Wojciechowski
Do you know how many North American people have "Polish" last names? This is going to turn into an amateur genealogy project.
Seems like the word "contest" is used more. As in "contest results." But that's just my perception. Worth noting, a competition is suit is a type of bikini.
We only want to have one main tag to designate onstage stuff, currently it's "competition", but I'm wondering if I should change that to "contest" instead, to go along with "contest tan". If so, I guess "competition suit" should also be changed to "contest suit" to keep everything consistent?
Does anyone have any thoughts?
What is the definition of "pectoral split" tag?
I'm honestly not too sure, I'm tempted to just merge it into "pecs" as being too vague for people to figure out what it's intended for.
Beyond basic file hash, there isn’t. I suppose a check based of video length and model name could be used, but it may be a source of too many false positives and it wouldn’t deal with videos which are partial videos of another.
Could probably do exact length down to the millisecond, but anything falling on exact second marks would have to be ignored as too common (possibly also 10's of milliseconds?)
Beyond basic file hash, there isn’t. I suppose a check based of video length and model name could be used, but it may be a source of too many false positives and it wouldn’t deal with videos which are partial videos of another.
Exact matching based on the contents of the file (aka, its hash). This means the file you are uploading is a literal, byte-for-byte duplicate of something already on the site. These are rejected outright at upload time.
The similarity-based method tamarok mentions above. This is able to detect images which are the same, even if one is a resize of the other. It's even tuned right now so that it basically never has a false positive. The problem is that this can't auto-reject images because we don't know which one is higher quality. In order to decide, we still need a mod to look at it. As a result, this just auto-generates an image report for mods to look at rather than outright rejecting the upload.
It's possible that many of those Leyvina uploads were in fact caught by the second one of these, but a mod hadn't yet had a chance to look at the image reports.
If only she decided to work out she’d look way better.
Qimmah is a perfect example of This but this model (4iP_3iP) is not, the weight difference is way too noticeable here she looks totally different irl very skinny zero muscle even when flexed.. she doesn’t belong.
Can you please tell me How does the similar image detection work ? By meta data ?
If yes it will be difficult to disincentivize.
It’s by a library the creates a signature based on the image content. The challenge is that it is CPU intensive. Anything with a high CPU hit will impact site performance and hence degrade the experience to people visiting the site.
AI based solutions would likely impact the CPU even more.
Finding the right solution involves balancing many considerations and factors.
I've been trying to think of a way to disincentivize this but haven't come up with anything simple and likely to work. If anyone has ideas I'm all ears.
I've previous also asked what criteria is used to detect dups.
This is an area where AI might possibly be useful to scan images to flag up possible dups
but I don't know how practical or useful it would be for you here even if it were possible to implement.
Otherwise uploads say, to the most popular models (if named as they are uploaded) get held before manual mod approval?
Log in |
Register
On the other hand, it does make it easier for the mods to find the worst offenders, when it comes to quality.
"outie" and "outie bellybutton"
You assume wrong.
Because they're still allowed, and also because being tagged will allow people to exclude them if negative tag searches become a feature in the future? (I assume this is a form of whining about some pic in particular and not an actual serious question)
Contest pictures or pictures with contest tans are "strongly discouraged" in the upload rules so why are you are encouraging them with a tag?.
There are tags for both "tiny waist" and "small waist"
It is now “bikini/competition suit”, unless anyone has any hard objections.
what can I say
According to the thumbnail, it's now also uploaded from someone else.
I am ok with not accepting the upload, it's just that there's literally thousands of other uploads along these lines and they're still up. I mean, my last few are literally the same thing and they were accepted.
I'm seeing incorrect assumptions already. Someone made an ethnicity/nationality assignment based on a married name. Example A: Carrie Goforth-Wojciechowski
Do you know how many North American people have "Polish" last names? This is going to turn into an amateur genealogy project.
Seems like the word "contest" is used more. As in "contest results." But that's just my perception. Worth noting, a competition is suit is a type of bikini.
I just looked. There is definite white face with heavy contrasting contest tan. What’s your point of disagreement?
Note, this is a video, so that single frame is not representative.
We only want to have one main tag to designate onstage stuff, currently it's "competition", but I'm wondering if I should change that to "contest" instead, to go along with "contest tan". If so, I guess "competition suit" should also be changed to "contest suit" to keep everything consistent?
Does anyone have any thoughts?
I'm honestly not too sure, I'm tempted to just merge it into "pecs" as being too vague for people to figure out what it's intended for.
😑
Could probably do exact length down to the millisecond, but anything falling on exact second marks would have to be ignored as too common (possibly also 10's of milliseconds?)
Beyond basic file hash, there isn’t. I suppose a check based of video length and model name could be used, but it may be a source of too many false positives and it wouldn’t deal with videos which are partial videos of another.
Is there any auto detection of video dups?
There are two ways we detect duplicates:
It's possible that many of those Leyvina uploads were in fact caught by the second one of these, but a mod hadn't yet had a chance to look at the image reports.
Kristina Zafirova has now surpassed Melinda Lindmark to become the 2nd most subscribed girl in this site... Great..
I agree with you.
It’s by a library the creates a signature based on the image content. The challenge is that it is CPU intensive. Anything with a high CPU hit will impact site performance and hence degrade the experience to people visiting the site.
AI based solutions would likely impact the CPU even more.
Finding the right solution involves balancing many considerations and factors.
I've previous also asked what criteria is used to detect dups.
This is an area where AI might possibly be useful to scan images to flag up possible dups but I don't know how practical or useful it would be for you here even if it were possible to implement. Otherwise uploads say, to the most popular models (if named as they are uploaded) get held before manual mod approval?
Bingo!
Yes I report them but it's like playing wac a mole.