I think that if every pic of a girl should have the same tag, then the tag should be a model tag.

(ex: https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?name=... with the "tomboy" tag)

I think that "tomboy" should be a model tag. What do you think? (If there's something similar, let me know)

Again, too subjective for a model tag. Already exists as a general tag.

If a model has short hair she could look like a tomboy, then grows her hair and wears a dress, no longer a tomboy.

Model tags are for fairly fixed and objective descriptions applied to an individual , not just a possibly temporary look. Other tags for specific images.

I think that "tomboy" should be a model tag. What do you think? (If there's something similar, let me know)

Ah nice, I missed this before! I do wonder what the Notifications page of anyone who subscribes to something extremely common like "biceps" looks like, though.

> Would be nice to have some height tags, e.g. 'tall' or 'short', as that's a characteristic that'll be consistent across all a model's images. Would also be cool to have a specific property for height per model (e.g. 5'9), but that might be difficult to make accurate.

Second this. But tall and short would be enough for now.

Yeah, would like to be able to tag models as this as well.

Suggestion: On the “previous girl of the week” page, can you pls add the pic of each girl next to her name

Great idea!

Is pawg worthy of having a model tag or should I search with the "big glutes" and "white" tags?

Body parts wouldn't be made model tags (same with "big glutes") because it's not on display in every single picture.

Anybody knows what happened to the "MUSCLEMOMMY". "MUSCLEMOM","THICK" , tags I just stumble across those tags a few days ago now they not there no more?

The first two don't mean anything. AFAIK "muscle mommy" is slang for any muscular girl, which is literally every upload on the site. "Thick" was also deleted but I'm not sure why.

Anybody knows what happened to the "MUSCLEMOMMY". "MUSCLEMOM","THICK" , tags I just stumble across those tags a few days ago now they not there no more?

Is pawg worthy of having a model tag or should I search with the "big glutes" and "white" tags?

I know it's the rarest hair color, but it feels weird to have "redhead" as a model tag, but not "blonde" and "brunette".

As far as tags go, I think general age is sufficient (over 40, over 50, mature, under 30, etc.). We don't really need a tag for every year.

If she's been training for many years her early photos would indicate a wrong age group.

As far as tags go, I think general age is sufficient (over 40, over 50, mature, under 30, etc.). We don't really need a tag for every year.

Generations could work too

Hello guys!

Since we have tags by girls' nationality, what do you think about adding tags with year of their birth?

You think that's a good idea or would it not be correct (after all, we all know that women don't like to reveal their age 😉)

Greetings to everyone!

As far as tags go, I think general age is sufficient (over 40, over 50, mature, under 30, etc.). We don't really need a tag for every year.

Hello guys!

Since we have tags by girls' nationality, what do you think about adding tags with year of their birth?

You think that's a good idea or would it not be correct (after all, we all know that women don't like to reveal their age 😉)

Greetings to everyone!

no, most of that information won't be available or accurate, are you prepared to the all the work compiling it?

Hello guys!

Since we have tags by girls' nationality, what do you think about adding tags with year of their birth?

You think that's a good idea or would it not be correct (after all, we all know that women don't like to reveal their age 😉)

Greetings to everyone!

Not for both no. I think the "upload" columns in model listing fit well in a group because they're related.

I feel that with the tag list you're scanning after how many uploads a tag has not how many are subbed to it, and the opposite for model list.

I fixed a bug where you could get notified for images that were in the queue. You should now be notified when they're approved instead, which matches the behavior with getting notifications for new pictures of a model.

Can you swap the subscription and upload columns in the tag list? It's easier on the eye when scanning through the list to see how many uploads a tag has as they will then be next to each other?

I made it match the model listing. Should it be swapped for both? I'm open to that.

Can you swap the subscription and upload columns in the tag list? It's easier on the eye when scanning through the list to see how many uploads a tag has as they will then be next to each other?

Just a thought on the “hidden gems“ criteria. I have seen more than a few hidden gems postings where the image does not have any tags at all. Isn’t the purpose to bring attention to an underappreciated, unnamed, or unnoticed model/picture? Tags also further this purpose. I suggest that hidden gems activation not be available unless an image has at least two tags.

Forcing an image to be tagged before it could be made a "hidden gem" could be an interesting carrot.

Just a thought on the “hidden gems“ criteria. I have seen more than a few hidden gems postings where the image does not have any tags at all. Isn’t the purpose to bring attention to an underappreciated, unnamed, or unnoticed model/picture? Tags also further this purpose. I suggest that hidden gems activation not be available unless an image has at least two tags.

This is an excellent add 👍

Thanks!