Today I had a chat with the Site Moderators about content deletion. The site's upload rules that we all know are as follow:

• No nudity. No adult content.
• No images from female muscle paysites.
• No cropping of watermarks.
• No images of minors (under 18).
• No images of trans women. There is a Trans Women section for this.
• No morphs (photoshopped images). There is a Fantasy section for this.
• No blacklisted models.

and there are more "secondary rules" that we should follow and that can get content deleted:

• Women showing very little visible muscularity.
• Images lacking femininity.
• Images where the focus is breasts or butt rather than muscles.
• High implants-to-muscle ratio.
• Contest pictures or pictures with contest tans.
• Highlight reel clips.

Maybe some of you know my uploads. I tend to prefer, and upload, the content of athletic/bikini fitness girl compared to physique female bodybuilding that need to have at least some degree of muscularity, as these are girls with muscle after all. However that caused some problems and sometimes (not often) I recive notifications about the content that I uploaded getting deleted for "Not enough visible muscolarity".

With this premisis I would like to create space where users can discuss about what's the borderline between fitness and muscular

a place where users can upload images that we are unsure if they meet the criteria of "enough visible muscolarity"

so that the Site Moderators don't have to take them down after they get reported. If the image we propose gets approved, it can later be uploaded to the main site.

I will start with 3 exemple of what I'm talking about. These are 3 different girls that I think can be considered borderline. For me all three of them are suitable for the site but I would like to hear your opinion:

sigmawiktoria123

sasaki__kisaki

White Bvnny

Of course this post should go above personal preferences. If you are only into bodybuilding you would not like my uploads and that's totally fine but try to think about in general the passion for fit woman.

I'm eager to see your feedbacks.

Yes to all three, I don’t care what anyone else says, having even a little bit of muscle is enough for the site. After all, if it wasn’t, then the bikini division wouldn’t qualify.

Yes to #1, probably not #2, a sure no to #3. But, it’s not my website, so what does my opinion matter anyway. 🤷🏻‍♂️

For the purposes of the site:

1 yes, she's clearly athletic and not just "generally fit." #2 I'd want to see in different wardrobe to decide if she's muscular or just emaciated and super lean. #3 I'd also want to see a different example to make a fairer judgement.

Me personally: I like all three, and want to see more of them, for different reasons for each.

Edit to add, I have no idea why the font is changing sizes.

id say all 3 have visible muscle... it may not be huge or to everyones taste but there is muscle there 100%

Today I had a chat with the Site Moderators about content deletion. The site's upload rules that we all know are as follow:

• No nudity. No adult content.
• No images from female muscle paysites.
• No cropping of watermarks.
• No images of minors (under 18).
• No images of trans women. There is a Trans Women section for this.
• No morphs (photoshopped images). There is a Fantasy section for this.
• No blacklisted models.

and there are more "secondary rules" that we should follow and that can get content deleted:

• Women showing very little visible muscularity.
• Images lacking femininity.
• Images where the focus is breasts or butt rather than muscles.
• High implants-to-muscle ratio.
• Contest pictures or pictures with contest tans.
• Highlight reel clips.

Maybe some of you know my uploads. I tend to prefer, and upload, the content of athletic/bikini fitness girl compared to physique female bodybuilding that need to have at least some degree of muscularity, as these are girls with muscle after all. However that caused some problems and sometimes (not often) I recive notifications about the content that I uploaded getting deleted for "Not enough visible muscolarity".

With this premisis I would like to create space where users can discuss about what's the borderline between fitness and muscular

a place where users can upload images that we are unsure if they meet the criteria of "enough visible muscolarity"

so that the Site Moderators don't have to take them down after they get reported. If the image we propose gets approved, it can later be uploaded to the main site.

I will start with 3 exemple of what I'm talking about. These are 3 different girls that I think can be considered borderline. For me all three of them are suitable for the site but I would like to hear your opinion:

sigmawiktoria123

sasaki__kisaki

White Bvnny

Of course this post should go above personal preferences. If you are only into bodybuilding you would not like my uploads and that's totally fine but try to think about in general the passion for fit woman.

I'm eager to see your feedbacks.

1 and 3. 2 doesn’t look well. To much implantat. Abs for sure, but arms and lags?

Many pics on the site are contest or contest tann. And lack femininity.

I am with you in preferences and sometimes my updates have been deleted for same reason. I believe, anyway, second girl is anorexic and out of the scope of the site. First and third girls are enough muscular for the site, for me

Thank you for your feedback, I see that most of you agree that sigmawiktoria123 with 29 ok and 2 no.

sasaki__kisaki at the moment is 18 ok and 13 no.

White Bvnny at the moment is 11 ok and 16 no. She already have content uploaded on the site by Ninjabrillo: White Bvnny.

what I'm understanding is that "enough muscolar" depends a lot on what the video is showing and not only on the subject of it, as I was interpreting before. So a girl can be "enough muscolar" in a video/pic with a good lighting but not in a different one.

I also often consider strenght when I think about what to upload. Some of you asked for more content of some of the girls to better evaluate your choice.

sasaki__kisaki in almost all of her video pose the same way but this is a clip more focused on flexing abs:

White Bvnny I thought was ok not only because she already had pictures uploaded on the site but also because strenght is a factor for me, even if it doesn't directly realte to definition. That's a video of her curling 12.5 kg in each hand, that's not bad for a girl of her size:

also I have content of two other girls, that I did not propose before because even I think that fall more into the fitness category instead of the muscolar one, but I would like to hear your opinion so that in the future me, or other uploaded interested, can find a guidline currently opaque:

grungexpu: I think she have beautiful legs (but probably I would consider them toned and not muscolar) but I found this clip where she tries to flex, even if there isn't much to show. However the two things combined made me think about posting it...

onuri: she is slim but I liked her shaking flex. Her glutes are a pretty cherry on top but definitely fall into the fit category of a girls that work out and not in the muscolar category.

The "no visible muscle" rule is pretty capricious. I uploaded a shot of the figure skater, Janet Lynn, and it was deleted. Now Janet was not cut, but she had muscular legs like young tree trunks. She was known as an "athletic" skater, and could jump like a gazelle. IMHO, muscular, but not cut. Apparently that was not good enough. [link text]

IMO what makes #3 white bunny video work is, the deliberate emphasis on showing her small but distinct biceps. They’re nice. And she is happy to show them. So many women with ok arms are simply unwilling got flex or always have to make it a joke.

OK. I think that #2 sasaki__kisaki shouldn't be here. She's not muscular, she's tiny, scrawny and lean. She's trying to be a gravure idol and the breastform that she uses is evidence of that (in other words her fake boobs aren't real fake boobs...LOL).

So that just restarts the question "what is muscular?"

Should Anastasia Mironova be here?

OK. I think that #2 sasaki__kisaki shouldn't be here. She's not muscular, she's tiny, scrawny and lean. She's trying to be a gravure idol and the breastform that she uses is evidence of that (in other words her fake boobs aren't real fake boobs...LOL).

So that just restarts the question "what is muscular?"

Should Anastasia Mironova be here?

In my opinion Anastasia should be on the site but I have a bias because I like slim strong girls and not bodybuilders... she have almost 1.5k subscriber and over 350 uploads so there are a lot of user that like her but I agree what the mods said that beautiful girls can be popular without beeing muscular...

In my opinion every muscular group should be appreciated, Anastasia don't have much upper or lower body muscle but she have great abs so she should stay on the site

I think all three belong here, and I say this as someone who is most drawn towards the extremes of muscularity. 1 especially, I could probably count on one hand the number of times I've seen a woman with shoulders like that outside a gym. For 2 and 3, the case might be different if they weren't showcasing their muscles (for instance, if there was a photo that resembled a still at 0:01 for the video of 3), but I think "sleeper builds" showing off their muscles should have a place here. Also, Anastasiia has fantastic abs, she definitely belongs.

It can also be useful from a historical perspective; if any of these athletes "blows up", it is interesting to have a chronological record of their progression. For instance, it's cool that we've got this 'borderline' pic of Angela Yeo from 2014: