https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2106943/
Stumbled onto this page, who did it belong to?
Gergana Savova, she's on the blacklist (presumably by request).
There ya go.
Your confusion comes from your own attempt to add exceptions to the rule, which are only in your head.
And yet the lady who posted it, didn't seem to mind. Therefore, why should it matter. She is clearly not the model nor the object/subject of the photo.
A lot of guys use these videos to "get busy" to, which I'm sure is one good reason why minors aren't allowed.
A lot of guys use these videos to "get busy" to, which I'm sure is one good reason why minors aren't allowed.
That's a valid point.
I can't understand the context behind deleting it. Yes she's a minor but the little girl ain't the main character here nor was she flexing muscles in this video..
It doesn’t matter whether she is the main subject or not. The “no minors” rule applies to anyone in the image. We’d simply rather avoid issues coming from minors being a photo and dealing with any negative fallout.
For models that have posted their own photos to this site, with their own kids, they have been understanding when we indicated why we were removing the photo.
So report it? What are you whining about exactly? You think it's favoritsm? No one's bending the rules for anyone, it just hasn't been noticed or reported yet.
Jesus Christ, I feel like we need some kind of banner at the top of the site or at least this thread that says "NO ONE GIVES A SHIT WHO UPLOADED WHAT FOR MODERATION PURPOSES".
I am often surprised how I spend like 30 minutes checking if someone already uploaded the Pic I want to upload. slowly checking every Pic she has on here. only to find out it was already uploaded anyway and I some how didn't see it. what is wrong with my eyes seriously am I the only one with this problem.
Nah, I've done it myself sometimes, especially for women with large galleries. One thing that sometimes helps if I think a pic might already be on the site and the woman has too many to browse easily is doing a reverse image search, since those will often return the GWM page for it.
Google has made their actual reverse image search much harder to access since they try to take you through their stupid "Google Lens" service instead, but the old version can still be accessed using a browser addon like this (I use the Firefox version, apparently the Chrome one may have issues) and disabling all options except Google, or using one to disable Google Lens. Very handy for identifying unknown pics as well.
The DMCA is an American copyright law. See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Mille...
Here someone would have made a “DMCA take down request”, which would require us to remove the image or contest it. Here we would have simply complied, if we believed the request was legitimate, since there is little reason to put in the energy to contest.
I got a notification this AM that an old upload of mine, from maybe 2020, of Carolynne Marquez had been merged into a duplicate, #1315315.
When I clicked on it, I found that #1315315 is on a deleted account. Not a big deal. But, I'm wondering why deleted accounts would get preference over active accounts. Thoughts?
"Your upload below has been deleted: Low quality."
Please explain