Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
I FOUND ONE!! She's on this site, and I'm pretty sure she's natty. She's at least a good example of how a natty woman looks...
I agree. She could very well be natty.
@Chester
Beccy Pateman isn't natty, not even close.
@pramitsen2008 https://www.instagram.com/anna.waigle/p/CnlEI... Anna Waigle isn't natty. Bulging muscles, competed in fitness, facial changes. But she still looks good imo.
Shilese Jones isn't natty, way too bulging muscles, typical mouth changes from juicing. You must realize that the top gymnasts aren't natty today because the requirements are so high at top level.
Victoria Jefferson isn't natty, as already said.
@Thessel "Chie Shikata" isn't natty, should be obvious from the pic and the fact that she's competing.
@Flyerboy
Lauralie Chapados isn't natty. Realize that she's juiced up for bikini, not physique.
@Jebjrj
Anja Langer natty?? You must be trolling.
She's a looker though.
No I am not. I always wondered if she was natural. She had awesome development but not with PED side effects that I could tell anyhow.
Some muscle girls are blessed with good genes -- genes that will reduce the side effects of juicing. There is no way any girl at that level is natty. It's a faulty assumption that a girl must be natty just because she has a cute face and a thin waist when she got a figure level physique. If you see several muscle girls competing on a stage you should always assume everyone is on gear, even the cute ones.
I didn't know she claimed to be natty. That changes everything. I withdraw my remarks.
cannonball delts, huge traps, looking like a female bber enhanced offseason? all the above. personally i think in the current state of fitness there is no sense in a natty vs not. i would say for sure 95% of women depicted in this pics have taken something. and between those, a good part are taking very high dosages. i just don't get what the obsessions is of finding natural girls in the fitness industry
The side effects of PED's are her muscles themselves lol. People always seem to look for other side effects.
They ignore capped delts, striated pecs, super dry lean look with veins, while still maintaining very impressive muscle size and fullness. The list goes on ..
And some people think a woman can't develop remotely impressive muscle at all without drugs. It is a pointless and aasinine thing to discuss and debate and by far one of the worst things about this site.
I wish people would just STFU about who is "natty" and who isn't.
The truth is that YOU DON'T KNOW. Unless you're holding her drug test in your hand or it's just ludicrously obvious, like she has 20" biceps at 3% bodyfat and male pattern baldness. You don't know.
So fucking no one here should be saying with any sort of confidence that this one is definitely "natty" and that one definitely isn't becuause her lats are wide or her shoulders are big.
IT'S SO FUCKING STUPID.
And some people think a woman can't develop remotely impressive muscle at all without drugs. It is a pointless and aasinine thing to discuss and debate and by far one of the worst things about this site.
I wish people would just STFU about who is "natty" and who isn't.
The truth is that YOU DON'T KNOW. Unless you're holding her drug test in your hand or it's just ludicrously obvious, like she has 20" biceps at 3% bodyfat and male pattern baldness. You don't know.
So fucking no one here should be saying with any sort of confidence that this one is definitely "natty" and that one definitely isn't becuause her lats are wide or her shoulders are big.
IT'S SO FUCKING STUPID.
I dunno what you're going on about. but the things i listed are perfectly easy ways to tell if a women is on juice.
The truth is that YOU DON'T KNOW. Unless you're holding her drug test in your hand or it's just ludicrously obvious, like she has 20" biceps at 3% bodyfat and male pattern baldness. You don't know.
That's pretty ridiculous. If you take this radical skepticism (AKA head-in-sand) view to its logical conclusion, one can still claim uncertainty with a drug test because of the possibility of a false positive or malfeasance.
All claims fall within a probability spectrum. If I said I have a dog and she's adorable, it's rational to accept the statement on its face. After all, hundreds of millions (or more) people have dogs, and just about all of them are adorable. If I said I had a dog who can speak fluent English and do jr. high math homework, then that's a rather unbelievable claim that you would probably be inclined to regard as false.
So fucking no one here should be saying with any sort of confidence that this one is definitely "natty" and that one definitely isn't becuause her lats are wide or her shoulders are big.
IT'S SO FUCKING STUPID.
It's not.
I’m saving this spot for the gif of Michael Jackson eating popcorn. I’ll try to remember to edit if the sight ever allows gifs in posts.
You've got to be joking. Girl is absolutely yolked lol.