Log in |
Register
What is your sexual orientation? (548 total votes)
I’m attracted to high levels of test too, but somehow only high levels of test in women.
I am sexually attracted to big, ripped muscles and bodybuilders who have high level of testosterone. So I answered Bisexual since both manly fbbs and mbbs make me cum hard
There have been discussions in various threads that would indicate a large number of users who aren't "straight" in the traditional sense. For many, there does seem to be at least some overlap between liking muscular women, and liking muscular men or trans women. I don't care about the politics of it all. I'm mostly interested in the statistics.
I took the liberty of creating sub-categories of "straight," sense the word is used pretty loosely when applied to this site. "Virilization" refers to the masculinized features you see in female bodybuilders, especially if they have a very large amount of testosterone in their blood. For many this is a complete turnoff, but for others it's the total opposite. Hence the separate categories...
There is only one category of bisexual and gay because I can't really imagine another option that isn't already provided in the definitions of the other provided options. I don't expect many votes for the lesbian categories, but I provided them just in case.
The poll is 100% anonymous so you wouldn't be outing yourself at all, in case this happens to be an issue for some. Others are of course welcome to comment about their personal attractions below.
I can't find my category -- I'm straight, and I love gigantic muscles on women but balk at virilization above a certain level.
Straight (but I obviously have weird tastes) - I like women of all kinds, from thin/non-muscular to mega roided with square jaws and bulging pecs. Extra points when the big girls do things stereo-typically feminine (makeup, handbags, tight dresses, high heels, etc.). I stop at facial or body hair, though.
I can't find my category -- I'm straight, and I love gigantic muscles on women but balk at virilization above a certain level.
I'm with HiHat...I am extremely attracted to muscular women but once the virilization starts to become too noticeable, I shut down a bit. I do find muscular pecs on a woman as sexy, even if that may appear as a more manly trait. The more feminine a woman appears, the hotter her muscles become to me.
Perfectly said. The big, mega roided fbbs who have obvious virilization but try so hard to look feminine; that’s the ultimate look for muscular females. Where they almost look trans. Yaxeni Oriquen is a great example.
Straight (but I obviously have weird tastes) - I like women of all kinds, from thin/non-muscular to mega roided with square jaws and bulging pecs. Extra points when the big girls do things stereo-typically feminine (makeup, handbags, tight dresses, high heels, etc.). I stop at facial or body hair, though.
Needs more nuance. Straight and I like female muscle, which includes a degree of virilization. A FBB with non-implant pecs that guys would envy isn't a bad thing in my book, but there's a point where the virilization is a turn-off; like a Dr. Girlfriend voice or having to look back on early images to find out if this GwM is a virilized female versus trans female, and that's not including body/facial hair fetish.
My answer: Straight - I'm strictly into non-virilized women; any kind of virilization is a complete turnoff
I love muscular girls because those big and curvy muscles emphasize more feminine bodyline, NOT because they look like men!
I really like very GIGANTIC STRONG muscular girl.... But I want their faces and bodylines to be beautiful as women. For example...
This is one of my own recent artwork. I know, this never represent anatomically correct human body, but you may understand what I want to say through this drawing. Bigger muscle mass makes her much more WOMAN.
That's a topic for another poll, a bit more complicated and I'm not even sure if it'd be worth doing. Here are already the three general categories regarding virilization, namely it's a must, it does not matter or at some point it's a problem.
The very premise of this site is that muscles by themselves do not constitute virilization and either are not masculine or alone are the only always acceptable masculine feature. Like I said elsewhere, attraction to trans or to the idea of a woman turning male is a different kink. There is a big difference in intention, though some might say that intention is ambiguous, can be faked and can change suddenly. But there is a difference in the histories and choices of women who want to gain muscle at all costs versus those who want to turn male.
I find it interesting that many trans advocates would even deny this distinction exists at all. On one hand to cynically promote their agenda, but on the other hand, because of certain narcissism involved, they find very difficult to separate intention from appearance or to understand that people might be conflicted about something, especially the cost versus benefit of something, for a good reason.
So, you DO consider intention on an individual in shaping their own gender, females that want to gain muscles at all costs vs females that want to be men, even if they all still own a vagina. Because in all your previous post you always said only biology has to shape admittance in the main site, so both categories belongs to it. But i am glad you changed your mind. Even if I think this was supposed to be GIRLS with muscle, not "What-the-average-Joe-consider-to-be-a-girl with muscle". But hey, as you said, i would not deny AT ALL the distinction you mentioned. If a female-born wants to be a man, he isn't a girl, and belongs not here. But I don'tunderstand a thing, tough: why do not consider a male-born that wants not to put on muscles at all costs as a man, but as a woman, as you did previously? It appears to me that you deny this other distinction exists at all.
Straight - I'm strictly into non-virilized women; any kind of virilization is a complete turnoff
Chest hair (recent discussion), facial hair, square jaw, etc. are complete turn offs. I don't view this answer as saying I don't like Natalia Trukhina.
I am straight and I like strong women. I can overlook some Virilization if she is stronger than average but there are limits.
I think I would agree with this for me. There are certain features such as a strong jaw line that I think look super hot on some women (eg, Katelyn Winkler, Marissa Andreou, Kassandra Gillis) but I would say that this is one of the few androgynous features I'm really into. I would say that most of my favourites are either in the lightly muscled female fitness category or if they are fbbs they tend to be a bit thicker and have a more curvy figure. I very rarely like some of the super jacked women that get posted in the GotW poll.
There have been discussions in various threads that would indicate a large number of users who aren't "straight" in the traditional sense. For many, there does seem to be at least some overlap between liking muscular women, and liking muscular men or trans women. I don't care about the politics of it all. I'm mostly interested in the statistics.
I took the liberty of creating sub-categories of "straight," sense the word is used pretty loosely when applied to this site. "Virilization" refers to the masculinized features you see in female bodybuilders, especially if they have a very large amount of testosterone in their blood. For many this is a complete turnoff, but for others it's the total opposite. Hence the separate categories...
There is only one category of bisexual and gay because I can't really imagine another option that isn't already provided in the definitions of the other provided options. I don't expect many votes for the lesbian categories, but I provided them just in case.
The poll is 100% anonymous so you wouldn't be outing yourself at all, in case this happens to be an issue for some. Others are of course welcome to comment about their personal attractions below.