Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
I was all ready to agree with you. I feel girl next door muscles are the best... Way too much steroid looking women on this website... Then you show the pictures... This website is "girls with muscle... You just showed pictures of... girls... wrong website dude...
Look up the models and you'll see.
My uploads of Colette Larsen, Emily Cook and Irisfit got deleted, with the explanation that there's not enough mascular visibility. Both images of Colette show her big and strong body, the one where she's in a group photo shows her huge quads and glutes. Irisfit is a wellness competitor, she's all muscles, the image I posted showcases her defined backside. Emily Cook is not a professional bodybuilder, but she's works out and has a strong lower body that was shown in that video.
The site is called “Girls with muscle.” I think it is self-explanatory.
My uploads of Colette Larsen, Emily Cook and Irisfit got deleted, with the explanation that there's not enough mascular visibility. Both images of Colette show her big and strong body, the one where she's in a group photo shows her huge quads and glutes. Irisfit is a wellness competitor, she's all muscles, the image I posted showcases her defined backside. Emily Cook is not a professional bodybuilder, but she's works out and has a strong lower body that was shown in that video.
I dont know the other 2 but Collette definitely has enough muscle to be on here
I feel like this is what we would call desensitization. We're used to see huge amounts of incredibly muscular girls that we lost the sense of what is considered average. They're not just girls. I would get if you meant that muscles were not the focus of the pictures, but the muscles are definitely there.
I don't know if this trolling or not.
Ngl quite shocking to see that these literal fitness models are not considered muscular enough. What are we doing here? Is this site designed to keep you hooked on a fantasy of steroid junkies that you never have a chance with in real life? So that you are forced to pay for videos, because you never get to see women like they're portrayed here. Time to log off for me damn
Ngl quite shocking to see that these literal fitness models are not considered muscular enough. What are we doing here? Is this site designed to keep you hooked on a fantasy of steroid junkies that you never have a chance with in real life? So that you are forced to pay for videos, because you never get to see women like they're portrayed here. Time to log off for me damn
I was suprised too. Would never expect an image of Colette and Iris to be removed, being that they are professionals. Emily Cook might not be one but she is build like a fitness model, and there are images of women here that have less muscular visibility, that are among the favorites.
I've had loads of visibly muscular girls taken down, I'm also a big fan of the girl next door look, kinda feels bad when you see some of the posts on this website that don't get taken down. I'd love to know who that is on the second picture though
i do like the huge girls but also the "small" examples you posted (theyre pretty muscular for women) but what is so hard about not using such utterly disrespectful language? roided up freaks, seriously? youre lucky there are no profile pictures here because i bet there would be plenty material to insult your appeareance also you are literally a creep reposting images of women you downloaded to another website and then you get this emotionally invested in your uploads jeez get a grip
i'll bite:
the collete larson group photo is terrible. half the photo is obscured with heavy shadows. the thumbnail doesn't reavl anything. i shouldn't have to squint to figure out what's going on
i undeleted the white suit mirror photo. i think that one is actually ok, althouhg if you weren't a person who knew what woman who lifts looked like you might not guess that she did at all.
the emily cook photo on the riding thing (what are those called) is literally a perpetual ass shot but there's no evidence that she lifts. that is a normal looking butt
the other ass photo si the same
generally ass photos like that are probably gonna get delted for being ass only photos but if they are uploaded they better actually look like they lift
i know we are a litle desensitized but have some descrtion
I've had loads of visibly muscular girls taken down, I'm also a big fan of the girl next door look, kinda feels bad when you see some of the posts on this website that don't get taken down. I'd love to know who that is on the second picture though
half of your deletions are self delestions
a few are blacklisted
the rest are non-muscled women posting the same ass poses.
just be a better uploader.
My uploads of Colette Larsen, Emily Cook and Irisfit got deleted, with the explanation that there's not enough mascular visibility. Both images of Colette show her big and strong body, the one where she's in a group photo shows her huge quads and glutes. Irisfit is a wellness competitor, she's all muscles, the image I posted showcases her defined backside. Emily Cook is not a professional bodybuilder, but she's works out and has a strong lower body that was shown in that video.