"Why was this pic deleted?"

I disagree, the thighs are pretty muscular and so are the glutes.

Looks suspiciously like a specimen of BBL. I see no evidence of 'muscle', but I do see 'fat'.

I disagree, the thighs are pretty muscular and so are the glutes.

I’ll agree with the mod. It feels like “too much focus on butt, than muscle”. It is more in the fitness than muscle, for that photo.

Can you please explain why this image was deleted? It said because it was morphed but it’s from a photoshoot

look at her non-tatted arm. looks like its' been touched up and her waist maybe got some helpher forearm looks weird AF.

she's a frequent flier lately, between the heavy face filters and doing things to her proprotions

Another version of this (unidentified) model was deleted yesterday. Does anyone know why? (i.e. this is a repost of the deleted image)

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2217285/

The original version of this that was posted yesterday briefly made it into the Daily Top 10. It had a lot of points, maybe half a dozen comments, and then it was gone.

The biceps are clearly visible.

To me there’s nothing about this image that says she trains. If she was thin this would be removed.

Another version of this (unidentified) model was deleted yesterday. Does anyone know why? (i.e. this is a repost of the deleted image)

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2217285/

The original version of this that was posted yesterday briefly made it into the Daily Top 10. It had a lot of points, maybe half a dozen comments, and then it was gone.

It's tagged as Kimberly Jennifer now (she's at https://www.instagram.com/kimberly.jth). The version from yesterday was a comparison pic, apparently she was still a minor in the "before" shot, which is why it was removed.

Understood. It sure looks like Jennifer (tattoo on fourth finger of right hand)

To me there’s nothing about this image that says she trains. If she was thin this would be removed.

If you say that, then you can delete all of her photos... And in general, 1/3 of the images on this site.

"the biceps are clearly visible....." Hard to tell for sure because the photo is so small. But it appears to be a NSFW type of picture that should be in the Forum.

If you say that, then you can delete all of her photos... And in general, 1/3 of the images on this site.

Some people will never "get it". Has obviously never worked in the Service Industry where a large proportion of clients are 'entitled' and the people serving them must exercise extreme calm in the face of blatant selfishness.

I wonder why the window frames and other features behind her arms are warped? Must be difficult to open a window there.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...

Honestly I lost count of how rich I'd be at this point.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...

Honestly I lost count of how rich I'd be at this point.

I'd guess off-hand, something around $500. LOL!

Im sorry but why was this not approved? This girl’s legs are absolutely insane.

Then post a better picture of them?

Tbh those look like normal legs.

I personally stay away from action shots. Like a flex it’s not the “most times” look of someone but it has a way of distorting muscle because it’s in most ion and in use. Someone with unremarkable legs could look nuts for a fraction of a second if they’re making impact with something or under load

Yeah no. Im not having that. “Normal” you say? I can send hundreds of what would be “normal” legs on this site that has been approved. Even in this pic and from that angle theres clearly visible muscularity. No definition showing bc of the angle but .. I will respect the decision. The call has been made so there is no point in me saying more here.

Yeah no. Im not having that. “Normal” you say? I can send hundreds of what would be “normal” legs on this site that has been approved. Even in this pic and from that angle theres clearly visible muscularity. No definition showing bc of the angle but .. I will respect the decision. The call has been made so there is no point in me saying more here.

there is nothing remarkable aobut this image

also, to risk sounding like thrice broken record, MOST UPLOADS to not need mod approval to get posted--they are direct posts and are not seen buy us unless we're looking through images or get a report. if this was in the queue it likely would not have been approved.

not sure how many times we have to explain this (this is directed at everyone)

also its for fake internet points, dont take things so personally. if you want to look at this photo on your own time no one is stopping you. or if you want to make a themed image thread where this would fit with others, no one is stopping you

To be fair this one did need manual approval because the uploader is new, and I rejected it.

It's just a super mediocre picture where the muscles on the kicking leg stands out because it's mid-action, and her left leg looks unremarkable. You can't even see her face.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...

Honestly I lost count of how rich I'd be at this point.

But is it as often as this one?

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2220218/

I actually hadn't seen that one before, and it looks to have just one other deletion, so it's far less than the one making me hypothetically rich.

Why were these pics I posted years ago merged with other uploads of today, and now state the pics were uploaded 3 hours ago?