Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
Looks ok to me. What are the triggering cues here? Intrigued to know.
Oh, you know, little things like how the texture of her bicep doesn't match the skin tone of the rest of her body, and the windows behind her curve. Or how her left tricep has sharp edges for no reason.
Just little tiny things like that.
Oh, you know, little things like how the texture of her bicep doesn't match the skin tone of the rest of her body, and the windows behind her curve. Or how her left tricep has sharp edges for no reason.
Just little tiny things like that.
Seems to me that there is a certain level of "bullshyte" on this site...like some doink going on about "If I had a Million Dollars" (which is a totally derivative tune) in all his/her resplendent complaceny --- as if he/she Knows Everything (which is vital to have before a fall).
Seems to me that there is a certain level of "bullshyte" on this site...like some doink going on about "If I had a Million Dollars" (which is a totally derivative tune) in all his/her resplendent complaceny --- as if he/she Knows Everything (which is vital to have before a fall).
huh?
huh?
No fault of yours...but there is something going on here. But that sensation is likely due to my being very old.
I do not envy y'all. As if blatant morphs weren't bad enough, we're only a few months away from being deluged by photorealistic AI fakes, if that hasn't begun already.
I still do not see where you arrive at "blatant morphs" Psster. If this photo above is a standard example, I still cannot see the 'morphing' in it.
Yes,the image looks like something out of DeviantArt...but, by itself, without references, it appears to be just fine. But isn't that the point of well done imagery? And how, pray-tell, is the average person to know? Of course, there will always be those that claim to 'know' an AI image instantly but, my question is, How do you 'know' that and how do you support your view?
usually its the context clues
usually they won't be as dramatic as this. good phone apps won't distort this much if you take int he waist a tiny bit but i would guess women that do it regularly are sure to take photos in front of blank walls for no reference, but if you ever waqnt a good laugh, look at goobu2's instagram feed. some of these girls are dumb enough to post a manipulated photo and an un-edited one with the same background, and you can see in an a/b that straight lines are no longer straight. one woman edited a stage photo that had the original available on RXMuscle. another edited a photo shot by herbiceps and it was pretty easy to see the morph
in this case the most glaring is the three windows behind her which should be identical. yet one is perfectly straight while the others are fun house mirrors. the waist has been touched up but not by much. also the tricep on the right side has two decidely un-natrual edges
old style morphs were pretty bad. now that images are easily manipulated with photoshop or photoshop-lite kind of apps its pretty easy to get it done on your phone.
sometimes we might get the benefit of the doubt but she is a frequent user of heavy facial filters on her videos, often head shrink (which changes body proportions) but usally something common like face smoothing that gets rid of blemishes and lines.
I do not envy y'all. As if blatant morphs weren't bad enough, we're only a few months away from being deluged by photorealistic AI fakes, if that hasn't begun already.
you're not far off. ive deleted a few myself that are deepfakes of muscular girls on MORE muscular girls. like we wouldn't figure out who belongs to who. its honestly getting too good
Thank-you Fp for your explanation of what to look for. Priceless tips actually. I have been using Photoshop since the late 80's and I know the signals. But AI is a very different animal.
I do not envy your position as website moderators...I'd guess that discussions amongst you all must be getting more frequent.
i'll admit i didn't see it at first, someone pointed it out to me. pretty easy to ge away with these days
Still, you and the others are doing a great job. Most of these 'modifications' would pass right over the head of 99.9% of people....your group appears to be identifying most of the fakery. That's good.
Still, you and the others are doing a great job. Most of these 'modifications' would pass right over the head of 99.9% of people....your group appears to be identifying most of the fakery. That's good.
we also have a ton of eagle eyed and experienced users pointing stuff out
we also have a ton of eagle eyed and experienced users pointing stuff out
Thank goodness for that!
head filter for sure
maybe the shoulder--they aren't straight lines on the stacks but they are kind of contoured to it
I would have $35.