Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
> > I can tell you have very little interaction with people irl, he's in danger and shared this with us the body building community to let us know just how dangerous she is I meet with these women all the time and I'm glad I know to steer clear of jessica now.
Because I mind my own business? You come into contact with far more dangerous people than you'll ever realize. I can understand wanting to know her history if you know her and will come in contact with her. But for the 99% who will never see her, it's irrelevant.
Clearly you don't mind your own business if you're still here talking about it, you can't understand shit.. I told you I meet up with bodybuilders all the time my chances of running into this lunatic is high because unlike you I actually step outside my door and talk to people.
Thank god her BF shared this and thank god for idiots like you who expose themselves when ever a pretty "lady" appears. easy pray.
Well stated and unfortunately this is probably the true essence of the case. You can't treat a psychopath with therapy. They just learn to be better at fooling everyone else. That's the scariest type of person to be around. Doesn't matter how hot someone is, you have to get that clarity to know the type of person with whom you're dealing.
Definitely a psycho she has that weird stare they do, like a predator shark.
> > I can tell you have very little interaction with people irl, he's in danger and shared this with us the body building community to let us know just how dangerous she is I meet with these women all the time and I'm glad I know to steer clear of jessica now.
Because I mind my own business? You come into contact with far more dangerous people than you'll ever realize. I can understand wanting to know her history if you know her and will come in contact with her. But for the 99% who will never see her, it's irrelevant.
I agree with the posts of Tall, It is none of my business. But Im reacting on how easily people (understandably) pass judgemnt on so little mostly not objective information and it becomes a (damaging) public conviction without a real court.
From a professional point of view, she behaves a surtain agressive way but with no background and circumstantial information it is not posible to come to any conclusion on her person or personality (diagnose) or how dangerous she realy is or was.
And as for "I can safe her", no but we could help her, if wanted and needed, if indicated by a psychological evaluation done by the juridicial system. Ive been working for 14 years in a forensic psychiatric treatment team, involved in the treatment of people who show this kind and much much worst behavour. But with that in mind, i probably look from an other perspective at the goob vids.
But hey if you want to stick a label, call / diagnose her a psychopath, sociopath or what ever you can think of. You could also register as a psychiatrist and ask 350$ an hour and do a psychic evaluation from a 2 minutes vid and the story of her ex wich leaves 58 minutes of heavily or heavenly paid browsing on GWM ;-)
I wish her and everyone else all the best
Clearly you don't mind your own business if you're still here talking about it, you can't understand shit.. I told you I meet up with bodybuilders all the time my chances of running into this lunatic is high because unlike you I actually step outside my door and talk to people.
Thank god her BF shared this and thank god for idiots like you who expose themselves when ever a pretty "lady" appears. easy pray.
Like I said, I can understand wanting to know her history if you're actually going to be meeting with her. Maybe if I repeat myself your comprehension skills will kick in. Hopefully. But, to equate not coming in contact with some random low-level quasi-bodybuilder - with not getting out the house, as if these are the only people to interact with, is something only an idiot would say. Not everyone's world revolves around meeting FBB thots.
Also there is a big diffirence between acting crazy and being crazy
The only thing that separates Jessica from other female bodybuilders, or women in general is that her episode is being documented. Am i breaking news here in stating that women are crazy? They really, I've seen the 'Nicest girl\ s ever´ behave no different to this.
"Men and women with severe mental illness were 4.2 times (men) and 27.5 times (women) more likely to have been convicted of a violent crime compared to individuals with no psychiatric diagnosis."
Interesting. I'm bookmarking this to read and verify from other sources later.
Unfortunately the link didn't work. I got a server error code. I looked it up on the Wayback Machine here: https://web.archive.org/web/20220317145339/ht...
Username checks out
Yeah looking through this guys comment history he seems to have a concerning fetish for women beating him up. Strangely enough heâs not the only one too Iâve seen a couple of people like him on the site.
Yeah looking through this guys comment history he seems to have a concerning fetish for women beating him up. Strangely enough heâs not the only one too Iâve seen a couple of people like him on the site.
Masochism is far more commonplace than sthenolagnia.
I wonder what is it then he really believed? What would have he said if he could have spoken freely? That he does not think and therefore he is not?
Decartes was a "thinker" extraordinaire.
My personal take was that Decartes was either agnostic or athiest. Probably athiest. The only way to answer your question is to recommend that you read his Discourse On Method from cover to cover. Take your time, it's the longest of short reads. Immense philosophical density. While he has many mentions of "God", in context, it doesn't fit. His appeasement of the church was clever. He gave them bits to cherry pick what they wanted to hear, but an objective reader can discern his true thinking. Most of what he wrote were his "true beliefs" as you phrased it. Where he strays or contradicts himself is where the appeasement is. It's not straight forward. He didn't have the luxury of that.
The original was written in Decartes' native language of French (for his period). I read an English translation that was popular in colleges: Rene Decartes, Discourse On Method, Third Edition, translation by Donald A. Cress.
I found the Cress Fourth Edition available on Archive.org. It requires a (free) login to read the full text: https://archive.org/details/discourseonmetho0...
Alternatively, the Free Library at Project Gutenberg has a different translation (I'm not familiar with) which doesn't require any login to read in full: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59/59-h/59-h.htm
You might read it and reach a different conclusion than I did. But my understanding is that my conclusion is consistent with that of the scholars that study it closer than you or I ever will.
...And now, back to our regularly scheduled program.
I know, I know. But it's better to indulge in fantasies than seek out the real thing. I went for real experiences sometimes and regretted it.
My real life girlfriend is the sweetest, most harmless women I know. She's not at all fit or muscular, and even if she were, she wouldn't ever hurt a fly. That's just not how she is. I'm very aware of how fucked up I am, which is why I've been trying to build healthy relationships with healthy people. I've been successful in that!
However, my sweet, harmless girlfriend doesn't satisfy my cravings for abusiveness. I still have to work on that. In the meantime, better to come fawn over pictures on a screen than to cheat on my gf with women that will ruin my life.
Now back to the thread's subject: damn I wish Jessica would slap me silly
Decartes was a "thinker" extraordinaire.
My personal take was that Decartes was either agnostic or athiest. Probably athiest. The only way to answer your question is to recommend that you read his Discourse On Method from cover to cover. Take your time, it's the longest of short reads. Immense philosophical density. While he has many mentions of "God", in context, it doesn't fit. His appeasement of the church was clever. He gave them bits to cherry pick what they wanted to hear, but an objective reader can discern his true thinking. Most of what he wrote were his "true beliefs" as you phrased it. Where he strays or contradicts himself is where the appeasement is. It's not straight forward. He didn't have the luxury of that.
The original was written in Decartes' native language of French (for his period). I read an English translation that was popular in colleges: Rene Decartes, Discourse On Method, Third Edition, translation by Donald A. Cress.
I found the Cress Fourth Edition available on Archive.org. It requires a (free) login to read the full text: https://archive.org/details/discourseonmetho0...
Alternatively, the Free Library at Project Gutenberg has a different translation (I'm not familiar with) which doesn't require any login to read in full: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59/59-h/59-h.htm
You might read it and reach a different conclusion than I did. But my understanding is that my conclusion is consistent with that of the scholars that study it closer than you or I ever will.
...And now, back to our regularly scheduled program.
Not to get waaay off track, but itâs common knowledge among even first year philosophy students that EVERYTHING Descartes came to after Cogito Ergo Sum â like his âproofâ that God exists and a loving God wouldnât lie to us about the world existingâwas cheating and tortured logic. As you say, probably to appease the Church.
Not to get waaay off track
We're going to need to move the Decartes stuff to it's own thread for anything further. I hadn't anticipated this blowing up beyond my first reply on it.
My reply is here: Rene Decartes, Discourse On Method (cont.)
Well stated and unfortunately this is probably the true essence of the case. You can't treat a psychopath with therapy. They just learn to be better at fooling everyone else. That's the scariest type of person to be around. Doesn't matter how hot someone is, you have to get that clarity to know the type of person with whom you're dealing.