Artistic Nudes

Irene Andersen did a nice shoot with Jay Fuertez:

name correction

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2027606/

No nipples or genitalia imho means it's not real nudity (in a common sense). So why call this 'castrated' content "nudes"? I don't get it.... Is this deceptive wording an American thing? Like calling an ordinary toilet a "restroom"? 🙄

No nipples or genitalia imho means it's not real nudity (in a common sense). So why call this 'castrated' content "nudes"? I don't get it.... Is this deceptive wording an American thing? Like calling an ordinary toilet a "restroom"? 🙄

Can you see any clothing? No, they are naked, so it is real nudity in anybodys language. It seems like you have no idea what nudity means! Don't confuse nudity with pornography.

Can you see any clothing? No, they are naked, so it is real nudity in anybodys language. It seems like you have no idea what nudity means! Don't confuse nudity with pornography.

In my opinion this is a prude and half ass interpretaion of nudity. But what shall I expect from a US website...

And nipples or genitalia are not per se pornography.

But what annoys me the most is that the forced blurring out of parts of the images is absolutely disrespectful to the creator. It's like putting underpants on Michaelangelo's "David". That's just not how it was intended. As an artist myselfe I strongly belive that this is unacceptable.

"Today is a fine day to show up to a thread and complain that it isn't something else which would violate site rules." --quintius, probably