Strength. Aesthetics are nice, but if she isn't actually capable of doing the things she looks like she should be able to based on her muscular appearance, then the whole idea just seems downright stupid and silly to me. It's like having a tool that can't do it's intended purpose.
I favor aesthetics over pure strength. However, when I see a truly beautiful woman like Abby Marie flex pects that look all out of proportion to the rest of her slim, athletic, graceful, gorgeous, yet rock solid body and picture her bench pressing nearly twice what I can, it really enhances the arousal I feel when gazing at her beautiful muscles and overall structure.
Both! Of course!
But then why is there so little enthusiasm for this new photo of Michelle Lin — in which she shows off a downshirt glimpse of the gorgeous pecs that are powering her 225+ pound bench presses??
Because the photo itself is below average even if we know who she is. If it’s a still from a video just post the video
There was a thread in "General / Nonfiction" titled "Where do you fall on the spectrum of sthenolagnia and cratophilia?"
I answered: "Sthenolagnia. I prefer the aesthetics over strenght, although I must admit effort is sexy - especially when working out and seeing the woman being able to lift bigger and bigger weights with time".
Appearance. Honestly, strength doesn't do much for me. When a girl lifts heavy, I'm more impressed with how gnarly her muscles look.
Both! Of course!
But then why is there so little enthusiasm for this new photo of Michelle Lin — in which she shows off a downshirt glimpse of the gorgeous pecs that are powering her 225+ pound bench presses??