Arms, I suppose. But I always prefer a well balanced physique. So both arms and legs, plus abs, and everything else. :)
Legs for sure. I love muscular arms too, but the legs have to be there.
I'm fully into Brazilian fitness girls who have huge legs and glutes but just toned upper bodies. That can still be really sexy for me.
But conversely, if a woman (or man) has a really jacked upper body and skinny legs, it's a major turn off. Like a I can't even look at them.
But like the poster above, I'll take both arms and legs together in a perfect world.
It's always been arms for me. The bulge of a great peaked, biceps can rarely be matched by even the most highly developed leg muscles. Arms are the body part women (and men) use to do stuff, while leges mostly carry them to the activity. To me armwrestling is the sexiest contest between a man and a woman, so I stick with arms. I also feel spectacular abs are the only other body part that can really compete with arms.
I prefer Arms. Big muscular arms.I donnot no why, but I think they are more rare.
Late to the party as usual - lower body for me. Show me a close-up of a muscular arm or shoulder and I would struggle to tell if it belonged to a man or a woman. Except at extremes of muscularity that aren't my thing, women's quads look different from men's. And obviously women do glutes properly.
To me, it's a rare and wonderful thing to find a long pair of legs with great proportions, partly because it's difficult to find how tall people really are. Those sites that claim to tell you people's height (and are all copies of each other) are often wrong. Images of Brazilians look great, but mostly it turns out that I could walk past them in the street without even noticing because they're so far below eye level. That's difficult for me to respect however hard they have worked on their bodies.
Legs first, then arms. Skinny legs don't work for me.