Forum
>
Announcements
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
@zarklephaser4
Thank you for those insights! I don't think there is motivation or time for the admins of this site to implement something as sophisticated to tag and sort pics. But if someone could make it work here, this AI-tool surely could be sold for a lot of money. Or does it exist already for small community social media sites like this one?
Thank you for those insights! I don't think there is motivation or time for the admins of this site to implement something as sophisticated to tag and sort pics. But if someone could make it work here, this AI-tool surely could be sold for a lot of money. Or does it exist already for small community social media sites like this one?
That could have been true a few years ago, but if you keep up with AI developments, its clear that AI will become ubiquitous, and cheap, and soon. Open AI is open, and is one of the most advanced, for example. It's only a matter of time for even a backwater site like GWM to have sophisticated AI available. And it will help us find exactly what we are searching for. And as @zarklephaser4 pointed out so well, it is shortsighted to add a quality filter at this late stage so close to the AI revolution, without understanding the implications. Those knee jerk responses really are important from a AI building a sense of what photos to prioritise.
The quality filter is old paradigm. It is like taking a gun, pointing at your foot, and shooting.
That could have been true a few years ago, but if you keep up with AI developments, its clear that AI will become ubiquitous, and cheap, and soon. Open AI is open, and is one of the most advanced, for example. It's only a matter of time for even a backwater site like GWM to have sophisticated AI available. And it will help us find exactly what we are searching for. And as @zarklephaser4 pointed out so well, it is shortsighted to add a quality filter at this late stage so close to the AI revolution, without understanding the implications. Those knee jerk responses really are important from a AI building a sense of what photos to prioritise.
The quality filter is old paradigm. It is like taking a gun, pointing at your foot, and shooting.
I'll take a definite improvement now over a slight chance at an improvement in the not-so-near future.
I'm not even sure the existence of the low-effort comments would be helpful to an ML model trained on the comments in some way, or if it would be pure noise, dominated by a relatively small number of users that doesn't generalize at all.
I am not an expert on using AI. I just like knowing about the philosophical and metaphysical side. In other words, what an AI is and what it is not, what it can do and what it can never do. It can never "become conscious" or "take over the world" or "program itself" or have "good will" or "evil intentions", like something or have a desire for something or "ensure" or "be concerned about" its survival.
I agree, and it's something that always bugs me about this myth about AI. Hollywood does nothing to help this perception about computers coming to "life".
I'll take a definite improvement now over a slight chance at an improvement in the not-so-near future.
I'm not even sure the existence of the low-effort comments would be helpful to an ML model trained on the comments in some way, or if it would be pure noise, dominated by a relatively small number of users that doesn't generalize at all.
It's your site Chainer, you must do what you think will work best. Hopefully you wont exclude short comments with excellent search terms which will help with future searching, sorting or tagging like 'peak', 'split', 'vein' or whatever the specific thing is that people are into.
I disagree that AI won't become conscious. Initially we will (mis)perceive AI as conscious but as it becomes more sophisticated we won't be able to tell if it is conscious or not. Therefore, we'll probably, eventually feel compelled to legislate for this, however erroneous this concept may be. At least, initially erroneous. AI will probably result in a representation of consciousness, but eventually how will we be able to construe "artificial consciousness" from "organic consciousness"?
Zarklephaser4 - Rather than all this offensive bull why don't you just say "I don't understand what you're talking about" instead of dressing it up as rambling nonsense? It would make your comments far more succinct, less idiotic and less nauseating...
"Are you trying to hypnotize people? Swinging a pocket watch, staring intently from under slanted eyebrows. "You will misperceive AI as conscious." A clear pause. "Then you will not be able to tell if it is conscious." Another pause, then continuing on a lighter tone. "You will think these bunny slippers are alive and willing to go for a walk without you. That has to be stopped. Now wake up!"
What kind of misunderstanding is this? Talk about delusional! You live in a fantasy world full of miscomprehensions and clunky, facile notions!
While this might be a stimulating discussion for a small handful of users, I might remind everyone that this is a website dedicated to girls with muscle, and as Chainer stated in the original post:
If you are trying to post a comment and the filter is stopping you, and you are really convinced the filter is wrong, post here with the content of your comment.
Unless you are reporting an issue with being able to make a comment under this new filter, then anything else seems to be off topic. There are any number of other sites and forums you could go to to discuss AI and whether it's sentient or not, or the ethics or it, or w/e.
Comments continuing this off topic discussion below this line will be deleted.
I had a recent experience with the comment filter that I think is silly. I'm not a fan of this new feature, though I am 100 % behind people being more respectful toward the women featured on this site and the people (like me) who frequent it.
I replied to a comment about Irina Pimenova being from Russia. I said, "Think she's from Ukraine," and the comment filter wouldn't let me post that. Then I changed it to, "I think that she is from Ukraine, not Russia," and it accepted that.
Is it just because I lengthened the sentence? Does it filter out incomplete sentences or something, even though they convey the same information? I don't understand.
I replied to a comment about Irina Pimenova being from Russia. I said, "Think she's from Ukraine," and the comment filter wouldn't let me post that. Then I changed it to, "I think that she is from Ukraine, not Russia," and it accepted that.
Are you sure that "Think she's from Ukraine" is exactly, word for word, what you said? Because I am trying to reproduce it, and that comment gets accepted. If you just said "she's from Ukraine" that would not be accepted.
That said, I do think the filter is due for some adjusting to make it less likely that the presence or absence of a single irrelevant word makes as much of a difference.
Why wouldn't "shes from Ukraine" be accepted? How is that a low effort comment? This seems to be getting ridiculous!
Are you sure that "Think she's from Ukraine" is exactly, word for word, what you said? Because I am trying to reproduce it, and that comment gets accepted. If you just said "she's from Ukraine" that would not be accepted.
That said, I do think the filter is due for some adjusting to make it less likely that the presence or absence of a single irrelevant word makes as much of a difference.
I'm not sure if "Think she's from Ukraine" is exactly what I posted, but it wasn't just "She's from Ukraine" because I genuinely don't know for sure where she's from. But I do know that I just extended the unaccepted sentence by a few words to say the exact same thing and it was accepted. I might've said "Isn't she Ukrainian?" I forget now. My memory sucks.
This was rejected: This woman is strong. Is that her max?