Eun Hee Kang + Other Faceshrinkers

So, does any of this apply to butt implants?

Because shrinking the dimensions of the head works the same as enlarging the muscles on the body. It changes proportions to look more dramatic, as if she had much larger and broader shoulders. It’s not about face smoothing.

Then what about pics take from a low angle to make a model look taller?

For instance, back in the day, I used to think Aleesha was much much taller than she actually was...and that's because the pro photographers would shoot her from low angles to make her look taller.

"Tricks" have been used in FBB photography since the early days. It's just much easier to use them now and they're more widespread.

Really? Do you really not see the difference between a skilful choice of viewing angle and a subsequent digital reduction of the head? It really leaves me stunned to what extent the argumentation here is completely skewed....

Faceshrinkers? Wait till ya see what roids have done to the faces of most of the favs here when they don't have filters/makeup on lol

is there a giant difference?

i seriously don't know what to think of some of you conflating someone using steroids IN REALITY with using digital manipulation to alter ACTUAL REALITY.

maybe reality isn't for you. instead you should check out this site. www.deviantart.com

Heres a simple test: "Does this photo capture something I could see in person?"

i seriously don't know what to think of some of you conflating someone using steroids IN REALITY with using digital manipulation to alter ACTUAL REALITY.

maybe reality isn't for you. instead you should check out this site. www.deviantart.com

If you're referring to me - then you're confused. I'm mentioning that mountains of photos here have tons of makeup/filters applied to covere the effects of roids. Roid use is whatever .. however the filters etc are sometimes laughable obvious and isn't that different to shrinking a face imho. :shrug:

The bottom line for this site is muscles. Any kind of manipulation that visually "enhances" their musculature, be it morphing (artificially enlarging muscles), head shrinking, or whatever is forbidden. There is no way to moderate facial filtering to a flawless degree, all I can say is that the more an image looks like a painting or digital artpiece and less like real life, the more likely it is that it will be removed.

i seriously don't know what to think of some of you conflating someone using steroids IN REALITY with using digital manipulation to alter ACTUAL REALITY.

I agree with this. The last thing I want to see are photos on this site of women with muscles made larger than they actually are by editing, as opposed to women who attained their actual muscle size by using steroids.

One option I've been considering (which I think was also suggested upthread) is to have a "soft" blacklisting option for women like Eun Hee Kang. Her pictures would still exist on the site, and would show up only if you go to her gallery page, but not anywhere else on the site (including the front page). This would make it so that anyone who knows about her pics and wants to see them can do so, but the pics are never shown alongside the other non-morphed pictures on the site.

That seems like a reasonable compromise. I assume they would also need to be blacklisted from things like "Girl of the Week". Would they still show up in in search results that weren't for their particular name (a search like this, for instance).

I like that last idea. Would it still be possible to upload pictures to the "blacklisted" pages. Or. would that create difficulties?

One option I've been considering (which I think was also suggested upthread) is to have a "soft" blacklisting option for women like Eun Hee Kang. Her pictures would still exist on the site, and would show up only if you go to her gallery page, but not anywhere else on the site (including the front page). This would make it so that anyone who knows about her pics and wants to see them can do so, but the pics are never shown alongside the other non-morphed pictures on the site.

I don't know about this. Doesn't this open the door to doing the same thing to other women who morph their pictures?

Well, if I went with that option, it would probably be used more widely than for just Eun Hee. I don't know where the line would be drawn.

Would be nice if just those specific photos were deleted, but I guess that would be a pain to sift through all that. With S.Korea and China being heavy into the head shrinking business, I forsee most of the muscle women from these countries being banned on this site. Im surprised some of these women have been up here for so long without getting the boot. I never report them if they dont look obvious.

In particular, S.Korea`s beauty standards are way outta control. Double eye-lid surgery, pointy chin surgery, calf shape reduction surgery... like wtf. Then the icing on the cake is small head photo-manipulation syndrome. The delusion of some of these women (and photographers) is ridiculous.

It's not just that deleting a few specific images is work for the mods. It's that once you figure out that a model self-morphs her photos, you can no longer trust anything she outputs to be real. Each of her images can potentially result in debating: is this one actually for real? Or did she just do a very good job morphing it so you can't tell?

I don't know where the line would be drawn.

Precisely my worry. I'm worried the line will be drawn too leniently.

I would prefer it if people posted pictures of Kang Eun Hee in the forum rather than on the main site.

What about a simple mark for edited photos (for users to decide) ?