Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
6 more have entered the 1000+ club! Also some placings from the previous list have changed.
Each country represented:
Countries listed in a tie are sorted by highest to lowest placing.
Samantha Jerring has also passed the 1000 mark. And Alessandra Alvez is very close.
That's very interesting, thanks!
Samantha has only 4 page of content while Alessandra has 18 pages. Noticing such a wide spread, I might consider adding this set of data to the next batch of results. It would give us an idea of how much content needed to be uploaded for each name in order to break 1,000. Similar to the list Chainer had posted a while back of who had the highest average number of new subscribers per post. In this case I would just list the number of pages and the user (if interested) could divide the total number of subscribers by her number of pages of content, and then divide that number by 100 (total number of images displayed per page) to get a rough value.
Then again I might just generate a table like I did with previous poll threads. Just something for me to think about for now.
===============
===============
This will be the final, most accurate set of averages. The number in bold is the average number of subscribers gained per upload, and the italicized number is how many images have been uploaded under their name since the subscriber system went live (March 15, 2020):
I might compile all of this data and present it as a table next time, rather than several lists and multiple values bunched together. Hopefully this isn't too hard to read.
Aside from the top subbed list, do we have data on which women have the most pages of content?
No, but I have provided total number of pages for everyone over 1,000 subscribers in the previous comment. Typically the Brazilians (I don't know why, but it's a fact) will have the most. So you could include Anne Freitas and Gracyanne Barbosa as well. This is just from casual observation, I do not have a list in front of me.
So I believe these values are more accurate and meaningful. You may notice in some cases it made a huge difference. Feel free to check my math or if you have other questions please ask.
EDIT: Interestingly, only four names appear in the top ten of all three lists:
This seems to be due to the somewhat recent (within the last 2 years) frequency of uploads. Others with a high average such as Vanessa Serros and Erika Darago aren't uploaded as frequently, and so their total subscriber number falls short.
Additionally, as far as averages go (something Chainer had provided a list for several months ago), there are many outside of 1,000 subscribers that would actually place higher on the list.
One example is Jessica Sestrem, who has 636 subscribers but only 1 page of content. So her rough average would be 6.36 new subscribers per upload. For an accurate average, she actually only has 45 uploads to her name... and so her average would actually be 14.13!
Larger discrepancies will occur with fewer pages of content, so referring back to the above list of averages, I think the bottom 10-15 placings wouldn't be affected much by a more accurate calculation. However the top 5-10 could be affected by as much as 2-3 points (that's my guess).
This will be the final, most accurate set of averages. As I figured, not much changed toward the bottom of the list, but some in the top 15 shifted significantly. The number in bold is the average number of subscribers gained per upload, and the italicized number is how many images have been uploaded under their name since the subscriber system went live:
I might compile all of this data and present it as a table next time, rather than several lists and multiple values bunched together. Hopefully this isn't too hard to read.
So there is one more list I'd like to share. This was made from organizing the names by least to most number of images, and comparing the result to their placings in the "Most Subscribers" list. So the two lists being compared are as follows:
==============================================
==============================================
By comparing these two lists, we can get a little bit of a better understanding of who will have the highest probability of being one of the most subscribed in the future. The following list will tell us who is more likely to maintain a higher rate of new subscribers per upload as their total number of uploads increases. All I did was simply add the two placings together to get a new value, and then sort that value from smallest to largest. For example, An Da Jeong is placed #3 in the first list, and #19 in the second list. So her value for the next list is 3 + 19, which of course is 22. For those who were tied for the same value, I sorted their names by their placing in the "Most Subscribed" list:
Obviously anything can change, such as any one of them might suddenly quit, get injured, or get blacklisted. But assuming "all things remain the same" then this is the most likely result.
EDIT: For anyone curious about Ariel Rose, she's currently at 986 subscribers and yet only has 118 uploads since March 15, 2020 (refer to previous comments for this date's significance). That would place her at 27th on the Most Subscribed list, but she would be #1 on the least number of uploads list. This would roughly put her at #15 in the list above with a score of 28. As more is uploaded of her, and if she is able to maintain a good subscriber rate, then this score will decrease, placing her higher on the list.
I'm not at all surprised to see Slava skyrocket to the top of these rankings. When these started (and even before I started modding) she had basically disappeared from fitness, even before Covid. So that's about three or so years, maybe more. I think her last show was 2018, which is when I last saw her on cam, and I think we've had an influx of users PLUS the addition of the subscription option for uploads.
now that she's back to legit bodybuilding and has regained her look from a few years back and has been posting more often, i expect she'll stay at the top or near it
Time for an analysis of Melinda Lindmark.
She's at 990 subscribers now and will likely break 1,000 in a few days. She (as of this moment) has 293 uploads to her name since the special date.
This would place her 27th on the Most Subscribed list (actually 28th if you include Ariel Rose, who is at 991), and #5 on the least number of uploads list. Her average subscriber gain per upload is 3.38, which would place her 8th on that list.
EDIT: I have heard that she is Swedish, but does she actually reside in Sweden? Or is she like Samantha Jerring, who is a Swede but living in the US?
Time for an analysis of Melinda Lindmark.
She's at 990 subscribers now and will likely break 1,000 in a few days. She (as of this moment) has 293 uploads to her name since the special date.
This would place her 27th on the Most Subscribed list (actually 28th if you include Ariel Rose, who is at 991), and #5 on the least number of uploads list. Her average subscriber gain per upload is 3.38, which would place her 8th on that list.
EDIT: I have heard that she is Swedish, but does she actually reside in Sweden? Or is she like Samantha Jerring, who is a Swede but living in the US?
Her pics are pretty sunny, so I assume she has moved to the us. I think most gwm swedes I know are in the us. Sarah Blackman, Pauline Nordin, Sophie Arvebrink, Samantha Herring etc
EDIT: I have heard that she is Swedish, but does she actually reside in Sweden? Or is she like Samantha Jerring, who is a Swede but living in the US?
No, Melinda still lives is Sweden. On June 6, she and her family celebrated National Day of Sweden.
Her pics are pretty sunny, so I assume she has moved to the us. I think most gwm swedes I know are in the us. Sarah Blackman, Pauline Nordin, Sophie Arvebrink, Samantha Herring etc
I see one reason why Melindas photos more sunny. She moved from Sundsvall to Gothenburg
Certainly, and that's to be expected. Popular women of yesteryear will have fewer subscribers than the popular women of today. Also keep in mind that the subscriber system is fairly new (introduced only 1-2 years ago).