Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
You can’t uprez old video like that. If you had the film, maybe, but those 240p videos would look terrible on anything larger than a laptop
Please don't post these AI-enhanced videos to the main site. They're basically morphs in the sense that they have been manipulated and it's hard to tell what's real and what isn't.
They are fine here in the forum.
I'll move the other stuff to the forum as well. Anything that might be considered a morph.
Sorry about that. I will fix this tomorrow.
The struggle is real.
So far I'm getting so so results with WPW, but extremely old content from ftvideo I can essentially blow up to from 240p to 1080p like new.
as1234, what software do you use to upgrade these clips?
Over at ftvideo, use search term remaster, and they have a number of clips that have been remastered. Andrulla Blanchette working out with Joanna Thomas are a few of them. Also muscleangels has remastered some of their older content. Hdphysiques dot tv has also remastered some Shannon Courtney videos.
I use topaz products for majority of my enhancements. I also convert a lot of these old videos to 60 FPS depending on the shoot.
Yes, Topaz is amazing, it can do magical things. ra5cvigi that is what I was using( the 30 day trial). I wouldn't recommend trying it yourself UNLESS you have a dedicated GPU. I'm using an GTX 1060 and it takes at least 0.2 to 0.6 seconds per frame - and even more if I try to either go about a 2.25x upscale OR use one of the more computationally intensive models.
Fortunately, the first few simplest algorithms seem to be the most useful ones by far.
When it comes to upscaling muscular girls and FBB's, the main visual artifact you want to to treat is haloing/ringing. Do that and all the muscle looks 100% clearer. That's the essence of what I did with that Brenda Raganot clip.
Unfortunately, interfaced videos are a pain to deal with. There seems to be some kind of tradeoff between removing the interlaced scan lines and dehaloing.
Yes, Topaz is amazing, it can do magical things. ra5cvigi that is what I was using( the 30 day trial). I wouldn't recommend trying it yourself UNLESS you have a dedicated GPU. I'm using an GTX 1060 and it takes at least 0.2 to 0.6 seconds per frame - and even more if I try to either go about a 2.25x upscale OR use one of the more computationally intensive models.
Fortunately, the first few simplest algorithms seem to be the most useful ones by far.
When it comes to upscaling muscular girls and FBB's, the main visual artifact you want to to treat is haloing/ringing. Do that and all the muscle looks 100% clearer. That's the essence of what I did with that Brenda Raganot clip.
Unfortunately, interfaced videos are a pain to deal with. There seems to be some kind of tradeoff between removing the interlaced scan lines and dehaloing.
Luckily I have a 5950x & and a 3090, so it's pretty blazing(I use this combo for my rendering machine :D ) I mostly use denoise & color correction (deblock, sharpening, etc) I feel AI upscaling is ALMOST at the point where it's totally worth it( I bought most of the topaz stuff). If you have any questions, PM would be happy to share w/e insight and videos.
What are some examples of clips of FBB's that you wish were at a higher resolution. Andrulla Blanchett and Heather Foster at their time, video quality was very poor. Or low res clips because...its instagram?
Heres one of mine: https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/1561461/
If only there was someway to boost the image quality...