Log in | Register
Forum > General / Nonfiction > Thread

Models you would like to be back on this site?

May 09, 2021 - permalink

Amanda Machado, Denise Masino, Annie Rivieccio and Rebecca Badwey

May 09, 2021 - permalink

I went looking for Kal Shepard (sp?) here yesterday and couldn't find her. Bummer!

May 09, 2021 - permalink

Francesca Mujica. She deleted her IG of 22k followers, made a new one with the same name (which has just 500 or so followers, is private, and doesn't get many posts), and also had her photos taken down here.

She is on HBC. I suspect either problems with stalkers (like Michelle Gavin), or a breakup, since she doesn't mention her (ex?) boyfriend anywhere anymore.

[deleted]
May 09, 2021 - permalink

I would love to see Brooke Bones back on the site but it seems like she erased her online presence.

May 09, 2021 - permalink

Jessica sestrem she looks fantastic.

May 09, 2021 - permalink

Jessica sestrem she looks fantastic.

Yup, now I need to maintain my own collection of her pictures

[deleted]
May 09, 2021 - edited May 09, 2021 - permalink

Erin Simmons. She had perfect legs. Also great abs, biceps and very cute. But those legs!

May 09, 2021 - permalink

Klaudia Larson. Some of the best biceps peaks ever! Now that Michelle Gavin's asked to be on the site again, Klaudia's probably the biggest loss to the blacklist I can think of offhand.

[deleted]
May 09, 2021 - permalink

I also forgot about Lola Montez

don't really understand this one since she has an OF she advertises. Like allowing stuff here is FREE advertisement she doesn't have to work at. Even if with every 3 subs she gets a weirdo 4th, that's still 4 subs and one you can block if they're too weird lol.

[deleted]
May 09, 2021 - permalink

Klaudia Larson. Some of the best biceps peaks ever! Now that Michelle Gavin's asked to be on the site again, Klaudia's probably the biggest loss to the blacklist I can think of offhand.

I don't understand this, Annie, Sherry, or any of the retired bodybuilders. I can't imagine that pics of them they already post are an issue, or older photography that's all over the web. We don't post anything here that would be compromising as far as "wow i saw your mom naked on this site!" or something like that.

then again i don't have my photos taken and posted on here so i guess there's no way for me to understand haha

May 10, 2021 - permalink

Tanya Hyde

May 10, 2021 - permalink

Aleesha Young

This is a little shocking to me. But why? I understand that there is no answer.

May 10, 2021 - permalink

This is a little shocking to me. But why? I understand that there is no answer.

Probably wants her content solely on her own platforms. There she can control her image better, suppress less flattering images or images that could decrease her revenue such as those of her children and husband and off season images. Presenting yourself as someone who has no problems in life, is always looking perfect, and is single is the proven formula for a social media influencer.

Sites like GWM allow for the less perfect aspect of her life to show, which could hurt her income.

May 10, 2021 - permalink

Lindsay Mulinazzi

[deleted]
May 10, 2021 - permalink

Sites like GWM allow for the less perfect aspect of her life to show, which could hurt her income.

I disagree. GWM is basically a social media mirror, and unless the account is private (or in her case straight up gone) I see no problem unless we are defaming someone or making money off of their image. This site is objectively not worse than some of her stuff she’s done on video in the past that have easily accessible screenshots that don’t point here. Some of the comments, on the other hand.....

May 10, 2021 - permalink

Green_Tea claimed:

Probably wants her content solely on her own platforms. There she can control her image better, suppress less flattering images or images that could decrease her revenue such as those of her children and husband and off season images.

Let's unpack this.

Off season images Aleesha took of herself, and then posted to her own social media, are somehow a detriment to her image on said platforms? That makes so much sense

Presenting yourself as someone who has no problems in life, is always looking perfect, and is single is the proven formula for a social media influencer.

You mean like Kim Kardashian, who's not single and going through a divorce and couldn't shut up about getting robbed at gunpoint?

All those couples and families with kids who make a living by sharing the hurdles of their lives through social media are also a bit inconvenient

May 10, 2021 - permalink

French girl Manon Vergé. I follow her on instagram and she doesn't seem to be as much of a show-off as many other girls in the business. I suspect she is in this business to look good and feel good, but she doesn't feel the need for approval that many girls in this site have. So I guess that's why she doesn't want to be on this site, sadly.

Either way, she is pretty much ideal for me. Big but not massive, she doesn't grow suspiciously fast like Anastasia Leonova and others, and she is cute as a button.

May 10, 2021 - permalink

Mallory Wick

Didn't she cut her hair? Her long red hair gave her a great "Girl Next Door" look.

May 10, 2021 - permalink

I disagree. GWM is basically a social media mirror, and unless the account is private (or in her case straight up gone) I see no problem unless we are defaming someone or making money off of their image. This site is objectively not worse than some of her stuff she’s done on video in the past that have easily accessible screenshots that don’t point here. Some of the comments, on the other hand.....

Exactly and because it's a mirror it becomes pointless for most of us to visit their actual social media, decreasing the amount of hits they get. Less hits means less money for them. The more hits their pics get on social media the more they're worth to sponsors. This also means more eyes on whatever paid content they're promoting. As opposed to here where we just get the pic, and not the text that may say they're running a promo on their OF for example.

Long story short it takes money out of their pocket.

May 10, 2021 - permalink

Long story short it takes money out of their pocket.

They should not be allowed to search for images on Google. A random person will not search for "Name". He doesn't know them. It will go to sites like GWM. And only then, having become interested, will go to the social network. However, this is their own business.

May 10, 2021 - permalink

They should not be allowed to search for images on Google. A random person will not search for "Name". He doesn't know them. It will go to sites like GWM. And only then, having become interested, will go to the social network. However, this is their own business.

Go to their instagram for what if everything is here?

[deleted]
May 10, 2021 - permalink

Most if not all of them do not get money for Instagram page visits or like aggregates. Their IG might drive traffic to their personal sites but it’s not a guarantee.

Personally I think it’s the other way around. I don’t find someone on IG and come here, I find someone here and go to IG. chances are that people aren’t saving their stories and ALL of their posts and reposting here, and stories can be a real, if not time gated, gold mine.

« first < prev Page 1 of 6 next > last »