✉
Log in | Register
Forum > Site Discussion > Thread

Wow, zero-bombers out in force tonight ...

« first < prev Page 1 of 1 next > last »
chevron
Jan 03, 2016 - permalink
Gotsta have a clean-up.
sthenolagnia
Jan 06, 2016 - permalink
Is there anything we can do about those people?

While I agree that we've been relaxing our standards quite a bit, that sure is not well-meaning participation.
Chainer★
Jan 06, 2016 - permalink
Can you post examples of pictures that look like they've been zero-bombed AND have been on the site for more than 24 hours?

This might help identify repeat zero bombers.
chevron
Jan 06, 2016 - permalink
I'll try to remember to do that next time I spot 0-bomb activity.
fbbwallpapers
Jan 09, 2016 - permalink
Is there anything we can do about those people?

While I agree that we've been relaxing our standards quite a bit, that sure is not well-meaning participation.

I say we make the minimum a 5 and make more people have to vote on an image to make it on the website. Therefore any image that passes moderation has to be one that a lot of people agree on, therefore having a score less than 5 would be unnecessary.
Chainer★
Jan 10, 2016 - permalink
It is already the case that a minimum of 15 people have to vote on an image to get it onto the site from the voting queue.

The way it works is that a picture gets onto the site if 15 people vote "yes" on it before 15 people vote "no".
fbbwallpapers
Jan 21, 2016 - permalink
It is already the case that a minimum of 15 people have to vote on an image to get it onto the site from the voting queue.

The way it works is that a picture gets onto the site if 15 people vote "yes" on it before 15 people vote "no".
I guess the problem is that we need to take a more active role in image moderation.
Thread locked by cgsweat★.
« first < prev Page 1 of 1 next > last »