Pics of girls that are TOO young

Come on seriously, some of these girls look maybe 12-13... even 15
This girl is like 15 or 16 call me crazy but most of the men here are obviously turned on by fit WOMEN... posting picture little girls just becomes creepy.  I honestly think it isn't even right that it be posted
Especially when comments float around that lean towards a sexual nature...  Is there not an age limit of pics for the women... It's a sick world everyone knows it is but thats just disgusting... My point and case is this forum does have links to nudity so then the site does... I like fit WOMEN I think its apparent, but little girls?  That's wrong and disgusting.  You can't trust people, definately not on the internet.  I read that it was against the rules to post pictures of women that look just too young.  So why isn't it being reinforced?  Sure gymnasts can look alot younger then they really are.  But honestly.  It's creepy something should be done about people breaking the rules.  These young women are being RATED on a scale of 1 to 10... I'm a guy I rate something high I not only find them pretty but sexually attractive... Try to say men arent this way so I can call you a liar.  I doubt a male is going to rate a woman on her respective ability to have muscle... I think my point is made there is no reason to drag on...  A few pictures of girls that I will gurantee are under age. Last I knew it was completely illegal to post pictures of children on sites that contain or give resource to nudity.

http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=4300   14 years old.
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=13230 can't be older then 16
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=10933 looks to be maybe 14-15
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=8852 12-15 max
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=7838 Highschoolers
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=6401 Highschoolers AGAIN
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=2770 Early to mid teens

You need to go check out this topic which has been cussed and discussed before. Look under MultiMedia>Pictures, pg. 2, last item: MOVED: Thoughts On Content?

If all the privates are covered up I really don't see what the problem is.   It's not illegal to look at an otherwise clothed 16 year old girl flexing her bicep. 

I don't look at all muscular women with a sexual intent, perhaps that is a failing of yours - but not everyone.  I also agree that little girls (or boys) should not be on sites like this.

I've already made lengthier posts about this, so I'll just address some of the points you made:

False on the illegal part. I might agree with you and think it odd if pictures of children were to be on the same page as the links to nudity (which has happened once, and I deleted the nudity link). However, on this site (which I'm defining to be girlswithmuscle.com and forum.girlswithmuscle.com), any pictures of minors are on different pages, and in a different context, than links to nudity. Also note that nudity isn't allowed on the main site.

It's against my rules to post images of children on the main site. In the past week or so I rejected about 20-30 uploaded images of girls who looked like they were less than 11-12 from appearing on the main site. Also, a 15-year-old is not a child.


Ratings can be based on any number of things other than sexual attractiveness, including muscle definition, size, etc. I suppose all of us rate images based on slightly varying criteria; this site is about girls with muscle, nothing more or less.

I'm willing to bet that quite a few people still in high school browsing this site appreciate images like this.

I apologize for any curtness, but it does bother me a bit when self-appointed morality police come and throw around words like "disgusting" and "illegal" in an attempt to control what people should and should not be looking at.

If there's any doubt about a girl being too young and sexually suggestive, I'd get rid of it. There's often a thin line between glamour and sexual innuendo. And there are many sickos on the net who want to apply Rule 34 to everything. However, if a pic is strictly sporty in nature like the young weightlifter (well you don't do sports or workout in jeans and sweaters) or a girl with nice abs which happens to be an occasional shot or a myspace album, I for myself don't see any problem.

Yep, me too

I totally agree with the original post, no one under 18 years of age should be posted in an manner....

Hey! That horse just twitched, let's flog it some more...   ;D

I think what we need are pics of teenage muscle girls making out with each other.   

LOL!!

1.  i'm with ursus here 1000%
2.  it is legal, and even so we have set boundaries of propriety as far as comments etc go, not to mention mods review images to ensure there is no nudity
3.  most of the allegedly offensive pics listed are actually in their LATE teens, and several of them could easily be 18-19.
4.  the only younger person in the batch is a nationally competing gymnast who was 14-15yo at the time, and wearing a tank top - her parents and civilized society as a whole sees nothing wrong with having her appear on television clad more scantily in a leotard (and doing splits to boot).  this, in comparison, is a far more "innocent" shot.  furthermore she is proud to display her muscularity and has taken and posted online (presumably knowing that anyone/everyone could view) numerous pictures of herself flexing her arms and abs.
5.  you can choose not to look at those images since the thumbnails show plenty of detail.  the only purpose of your post, it therefore seems, is to criticize and attempt to control what others do or what your perverse imaginings would have them do.

Consider yourself zinged, b1tch.

 ;)

This whole subject is getting very stale. Almost every time I come onto this forum, there is someone trying to dictate what is right or wrong to the rest of us.
None of the photographs on this site are illegal. If there were such photo's, this forum would have been shut down by now.
Have you nothing better to do with your time?; "this isn't suitable, that should be removed".
They are just a bunch of photographs. If you don't want to look at them, fuck off somewhere else!

If you feel that strongly about the subject of child exploitation, perhaps you should try and spend your time finding sites that contain content of that nature, and try and get those sites closed, instead of wasting your time complaining to us.

Respect the moderators or get lost!

Can someone do something about fly by trolling and unneeded debate:  http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=33802

The legal system does not consider this porn,although it is muscleporn to those who come here.Thats the diry little secret."Admiring" my ass.It is up to the viewer and no one else to judge what they feel is right to view about questionable age photos,esp if the photos have been posted in the context of the sport they compete in.