Log in | Register
« first < prev Page 1 of 4,323 next > last »
19 minutes ago - context

Sorry but this poll makes no sense to me... For Lower parts (tights) is more to size with definition For Upper parts CAN NOT BE size

= Big tights/legs with regular and no muscular Arms..

25 minutes ago - context

Can't post valid link yet

https: //youtu .be/dLACj0TpCRc?si=LxVgyPeZXNG2AVGj

0:54, 3:28

LITTLE BIG & РУКИ ВВЕРХ! - СЛЭМЯТСЯ ПАЦАНЫ

25 minutes ago - context

I love this post! Here is my favorite mature woman:

1 hour ago - context
1 hour ago - context
1 hour ago - context
1 hour ago - context
1 hour ago - context
1 hour ago - context
1 hour ago - context

[Click me] (

)

1 hour ago - context
1 hour ago - context

Not really an FBB, but at least a flex at the end:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCxgUPFVFkA

1 hour ago - context
1 hour ago - edited 1 hour ago - context

You aren't exactly invalidating my assumption that you lack both the self-awareness and restraint to not end up banned eventually, OP.

I was serious about saving us both time and getting it over with, yours is the kind of account that if banned will likely have all its comments auto-hidden, so it's not like you'll be leaving behind anything visible on the site, and any effort you're putting into posts and comments will be wasted. I also notice you've literally never contributed anything in terms of uploads, just your written "valuable insights" (most of which are either antagonistic or TMI-ish), so you wouldn't be losing a personal gallery or anything.

1 hour ago - context
2 hours ago - context
2 hours ago - context

It looks like Heidi Vuorela, but I'm not sure.

2 hours ago - context

That's why Anastasia wears a wig, the roids strike back.

2 hours ago - context

wow I just fell in love with the right one

2 hours ago - context

yeah and we’ve also both probably taken some really phat shits in our lives.

Buffalo Wild Wings is doing all you can eat wings for a limited time! You sure you don't want me to message you about the aftermath of me hitting that up?

fp909
2 hours ago - context

C'mon man, don't tell me you are not stroking your salami almost every time when you visit this (still) cool and useful website. I'm just more open about that than other users are.

This is the kind of comment women see and ask for take downs and then users like you ask “why did x get removed she was my favorite”

fp909
2 hours ago - context

Just a few years ago there were many pictures of teens below 18 on this site - Dylan Crenshaw and Georgina McDonald for example. So back then, when this was ok, the guys who run this site were "dumb" and bad persons, right? According to your logic...

There are some reasons for this:

There are a ton of photos on this site and in previous iterations things could get lost pretty easily if one of the bulk uploaders shows up. We are pretty quick to add to the blacklist but there’s also the factor of not knowing on sight if they are a minor if we don’t know who they are. If I have time I’llLook it up but maybe it’s not a name or they’re 16-17 and look a little older but I don’t have a name. I’ll ofte err on the side of caution and clear it but we rely on reports a lot.

Also half of us at least try to go back in time regularly to clear posts from the earliest years which very are very much buried.

Also Dylan herself I believe was participating in posting herself but those photos are long removed.

It’s not the gotcha people think it is, like Irish or dd on the spot try to drop, becuase we’re fairly aggressive in taking down posts when we see them, banning posters who know the rules and if ignore them and permabNning repeat offenders.

2 hours ago - context

C'mon man, don't tell me you are not stroking your salami almost every time when you visit this (still) cool and useful website. I'm just more open about that than other users are.

yeah and we’ve also both probably taken some really phat shits in our lives. should we talk about that too? maybe send each other pics?

some things are best kept private.

2 hours ago - edited 2 hours ago - context

Things can change for the better, and not permitting that anymore is a great thing and I'm glad the admins and mods decided on that. Something being "ok" in the past doesn't make it right.

And yes, this is a site for people who are attracted to muscular women, but you can have a preference, attraction and even a fetish while still conducting yourself with class. Muscular women aren't dumb in that they are ignorant to what guys like us do to their pics and videos, but that doesn't mean you need to explicitly talk about orgasms or whatever when describing them. That's not being prudish: that's being respectful.

It comes to social awareness/skills 101.

Dont' lecture me like a kid. I never post horny or other comments under the Insta and Tiktok accounts of these women (I don't waste my time with social media). But I also will not pretend that this website is anything else than a huge warehouse filled with jerk off content. But you and your buddies of course can virtue signall as long as you want. And btw, 18 is just a number. It does not determine morals in an absolute way. In most countries you are allowed to have sex with people below 18. But looking at pictures of a person (in skimpy outfit) below 18 is bad? That's just stupid,

2 hours ago - edited 2 hours ago - context

dude reaaaaally wants the rest of us to know about his orgasms

C'mon man, don't tell me you are not stroking your salami almost every time when you visit this (still) cool and useful website. I'm just more open about that than other users are.

« first < prev Page 1 of 4,323 next > last »